By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

From my experience idiotic fanatics are the worst critics available. Yes I am looking at ninety percent of the posters in this thread. Being ignorant about a source is your problem not the sources. Ignorance is easily cured you have the link see what else the site has to say about other various subjects. The reality sadly is a great many of you are too stupid, too lazy, and too self absorbed to do so.

Yes I am being an asshole, and yes you utterly deserve to be called on your childish behavior. Grow the hell up already and have the decency to try to get to the know the site your going to trash talk about. I know what a really radical concept informing yourself before you start to talk out your ass this couldn't possibly catch on.

I wonder if any of you can comprehend the notion that disparity of perspectives is a valid tool towards greater understanding. When two points of view are in conflict they often fish out valid points. Nice to see that so many of you formed a lynch mob started to stone the town minority, and hurling insults. Hell lets just nail him to a cross, and erect him in the town landfill.

Obviously a great many of you lack a certain capacity for critical thinking, and more to the point only have a very shallow view of reality. What you should have done was used this article as a pretext to discuss the cons of the peripheral rather then blindly defending said product. Nothing has been or ever will be perfect. Further if any reviewer out there is matching you perfectly chances are that reviewer is doing a shabby job, and you probably shouldn't listen to that reviewer anymore.

There are a great many sites that cater to ignorant fanatics who will praise all products for said platform. They will gladly treat every product with kid gloves, and will drag a silver lining out till it covers every dark cloud in the sky. Which usually means they really do not care about what they are reviewing in the least, because they are bound to find something that no matter how popular they truly despise, and will have the convictions to say so.

On the side of the debate. I agree with the sentiment that the Controller for the Wii is a terribly shitty product. I am glad to see that many of you despite the propaganda you spew constantly finally agree with me. This peripheral will help gaming greatly. However I am concerned be the fact that Nintendo has gotten heady on peripherals yet again, and two generations ago they reaped some bitter fruits through this nonsense.

Nintendo seems to have a problem distinguishing between what is acceptable, and what is not acceptable with consumers. This will be the fifth peripheral for the console, and the console isn't even two years old yet. All of these peripherals are going to lead to a console that is not user friendly, and a great many consumers are going to get upset about being expected to fork out hundreds of dollars more just to play this or that new game.

I am not sure about the wealthy out there, but I am not keen on the prospect that after buying a new game that I might be expected to fork out another sixty or seventy dollars to buy the peripherals I really need, because they are required hardware. I would hate to be told that for the new Zelda I must purchase this peripheral, a external memory unit, and a balance board.

I suppose in that sense I agree with the argument that perhaps this peripheral was not needed at all. The console was muddling through with the controller that came packaged with the console. Perhaps it was not perfect, but it was usable. So exactly why are consumers going to be asked to flip the bill for this peripheral?