Kasz216 said:
I guess the not going back line was a bold faced lie then? He was honest about why even though it might lose some fans since it was money oriented against the players best needs... then goes out of his way to lie? Doesn't make sense.
|
I am not making it up. That's what Sony said when they removed it :)
http://gamernode.com/News/4697-The-real-reason-for-no-BC-on-the-40GB-PS3/index.html
According to the WSJ: "Mr. Tretton conceded that removing that capability [backwards compatibility], along with a few other features, isn't dramatically reducing Sony's cost of manufacturing the console but will instead encourage buyers of the entry-level PlayStation 3 to purchase more games designed specifically for the new system."







