By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Killzone 3 vs Halo Reach

LOL@mendicate saying that halo reach won't sale 5 million copies lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ahahahahahahaahha



Around the Network
gamings_best said:
damkira said:

KillZone 2 had fairly good sales but I seriously doubt Sony made any money off of it after development and massive promotional costs... Even with all that, it sold less than half of Halo 3. There is no comparison.

 

oh they made thier money back, and ummm killzone 2 had one televised commerical that aired one day before the games release, Halo 3 had it's own clothing, food, and book line before the first trailer

Yeah, but Halo 3 was the biggest entertainment launch of all time.. of course it had those things. I seriously doubt KillZone 2 made its money back because the production budget alone was $60 million.

 



rafichamp said:
In terms of sales, Halo Reach will most likely win. However you must not forget about Microsoft's aging console, if sales for 360 do not pick up during Q3-Q4 of this year, Halo Reach may have sales no greater then 5-6 million. Doing Halo 3 numbers (10 million) will almost be impossible for this release. Reason why? The COD franchise has over taken the Halo franchise and a new COD game is releasing Q4 of this year, Halo will not stand a chance against it. In terms of graphics, KZ3 will win b/c judging from the screenshots Halo Reach looks worse then KZ2.

LOL! Aging console? Hahahaha.



Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?

gamings_best said:
heruamon said:
Kinda like a High School (KZ franchise) team vs. a pro team (Halo).

in trems of sales, everything is the exact opposite

I disagree. KZ is a "me too" shooter that wouldn't exist if Halo hadn't been so popular.



PearlJam said:
gamings_best said:
heruamon said:
Kinda like a High School (KZ franchise) team vs. a pro team (Halo).

in trems of sales, everything is the exact opposite

I disagree. KZ is a "me too" shooter that wouldn't exist if Halo hadn't been so popular.

you've never played killzone 2, everyone who said killzone copied anything and I mean ANYTHING from halo 3 NEVER EVER EVER played killzone 2



Around the Network
gamings_best said:
PearlJam said:
gamings_best said:
heruamon said:
Kinda like a High School (KZ franchise) team vs. a pro team (Halo).

in trems of sales, everything is the exact opposite

I disagree. KZ is a "me too" shooter that wouldn't exist if Halo hadn't been so popular.

you've never played killzone 2, everyone who said killzone copied anything and I mean ANYTHING from halo 3 NEVER EVER EVER played killzone 2

You obviously didn't understand a single word from my post.



PearlJam said:
gamings_best said:
heruamon said:
Kinda like a High School (KZ franchise) team vs. a pro team (Halo).

in trems of sales, everything is the exact opposite

I disagree. KZ is a "me too" shooter that wouldn't exist if Halo hadn't been so popular.

And Forza is just a "me too" racer that wouldn't exist if GT hadn't been around......sounds retarded doesn't it? just because another devs decides to make their own Racer or shooter doesn't mean their doing it just to copy.



KZ3 is going to get smashed by Halo Reach if they think of lining up releases. Add in COD number 7 and KZ3 is done for completely. I don't think Sony is that stupid, to place a title in a series, to die...

They'll want KZ3 to get as much attention as it can get, and that's probably in the same time frame as the previous one, somewhere in February or maybe even later.



Ping_ii said:
PearlJam said:
gamings_best said:
heruamon said:
Kinda like a High School (KZ franchise) team vs. a pro team (Halo).

in trems of sales, everything is the exact opposite

I disagree. KZ is a "me too" shooter that wouldn't exist if Halo hadn't been so popular.

And Forza is just a "me too" racer that wouldn't exist if GT hadn't been around......sounds retarded doesn't it?

Actually no, that doesn't sound retarded at all. In fact it makes perfect sense. IMHO Forza is a direct answer to GT, MS saw the popularity and sales of GT so they made their own similar racer. IMHO if GT wasn't so pouplar and successful, we probably wouldn't have Forza.

 

Sorry guy this isn't about Sony vs MS for me, I'm actually a GT guy as I prefer it to Forza. It's a very similar situation, I think Sony does Racers better but I think MS has had better shooters.



PearlJam said:
Ping_ii said:
PearlJam said:
gamings_best said:
heruamon said:
Kinda like a High School (KZ franchise) team vs. a pro team (Halo).

in trems of sales, everything is the exact opposite

I disagree. KZ is a "me too" shooter that wouldn't exist if Halo hadn't been so popular.

And Forza is just a "me too" racer that wouldn't exist if GT hadn't been around......sounds retarded doesn't it?

Actually no, that doesn't sound retarded at all. In fact it makes perfect sense. IMHO Forza is a direct answer to GT, MS saw the popularity and sales of GT so they made their own similar racer. IMHO if GT wasn't so pouplar and successful, we probably wouldn't have Forza.

 

Sorry guy this isn't about Sony vs MS for me, I'm actually a GT guy as I prefer it to Forza. It's a very similar situation, I think Sony does Racers better but I think MS has had better shooters.

Sigh....whatever its your opinion but to me its retarted to say X game is just made to copy Y game and nothing else.