It would be better +1 and -2.
+PS2
-Xbox
Boutros said: It would be better +1 and -2. +PS2 -Xbox |
Yep, I'll do that from now on.
Last poster: MANUELF
22 - Snes
22 - Dreamcast
21 - N64
21 - Wii
20 - Nes
20 - Gameboy
20 - Gameboy pocket
20 - Gameboy colour
20 - Gameboy advance/SP/micro
20 - DS/lite/i
20 - PSP
20 - Master system
20 - Megadrive
20 - Saturn
20 - Gamegear
20 - atari 1200
20 - atari 2600
20 - Commodore 64
18 - Gamecube
18 - PS1
18 - atari 800
18 - Atari jaguar
17 - PS2
16 - Xbox
16 - Intellivision
15 - Xbox 360
14 - Virtual boy
14 - PS3
tedsteriscool said:
Yep, I'll do that from now on. |
But then you would have to adapt the inital number of point that each console has depending on how long you want the game to last.
Boutros said:
But then you would have to adapt the inital number of point that each console has depending on how long you want the game to last. |
I applied the +1, -2 rule to all posts from the beginning. See the list above you.
tedsteriscool said:
I applied the +1, -2 rule to all posts from the beginning. See the list above you. |
Yeah I know but what I'm saying is that the game will end quickly if you apply +1 and -2. I think 10 points is a little too low. I would say either 15 or 20. But those are just suggestions.
Boutros said:
Yeah I know but what I'm saying is that the game will end quickly if you apply +1 and -2. I think 10 points is a little too low. I would say either 15 or 20. But those are just suggestions. |
Hmmm...I see what you're saying. I don't want to drag it out, but changing it to 20 might give more voters the opportunity since it seems some consoles will be eliminated really quickly.
Edit: Changed, no vote scoring was impacted due to the change. The only difference is now the competition will last a bit longer, giving more people the opportunity to vote.