Quantcast
PS3 outperforms Xbox 360 for EA again

Forums - Gaming Discussion - PS3 outperforms Xbox 360 for EA again

heruamon said:
starcraft said:
CGI-Quality said:
heruamon said:
BHR-3 said:
nice

hopefully they will port L4D over to the ps3 b/c of this


because of what...fanboy delusions?

How can one with such a one-sided agenda call anything "fanboy delusions"? What makes YOU any better? Why does someone always have to be a "fanboy" due to a mere preference? I never understood this line of thinking.

There are some great examples of heruamon being a fanboy lying around VGC.  This isn't one of them. 

Spartan has comletely misled people with the OP to the point of being ridiculous.

You're correct about me having my moments of fanboydom, but in this case, I'm pointing the finger at the OP article link, which is incorrect...and at Spartan's continual attempt to go along with information that is CLEARLY incorrect...I'm not sure what CGI and other are rguing for...my suggestion is for them to READ the 10-Q, instead of commenting on a topic that they haven't done some due-diligence on.

Read my post above, my comment to you was specific to what I observe of you. Again, Spartan may very well be incorrect. But your labeling of him (and others) I found ironic since you yourself display this sort of behavior.



                                                                                                                                            

Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
heruamon said:
starcraft said:
CGI-Quality said:
heruamon said:
BHR-3 said:
nice

hopefully they will port L4D over to the ps3 b/c of this


because of what...fanboy delusions?

How can one with such a one-sided agenda call anything "fanboy delusions"? What makes YOU any better? Why does someone always have to be a "fanboy" due to a mere preference? I never understood this line of thinking.

There are some great examples of heruamon being a fanboy lying around VGC.  This isn't one of them. 

Spartan has comletely misled people with the OP to the point of being ridiculous.

You're correct about me having my moments of fanboydom, but in this case, I'm pointing the finger at the OP article link, which is incorrect...and at Spartan's continual attempt to go along with information that is CLEARLY incorrect...I'm not sure what CGI and other are rguing for...my suggestion is for them to READ the 10-Q, instead of commenting on a topic that they haven't done some due-diligence on.

Read my post above, my comment to you was specific to what I observe of you. Again, Spartan may very well be incorrect. But your labeling of him (and others) I found ironic since you yourself display this sort of behavior.

I don't get your point...I am a Xbox fanboy...I wear the label quite proudly...for chrissake, we hang out on a video game site all day.  I have my console preference, and that's that.  With that said, please provide the “specific” example of me mis-representing data? 



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder

Slimebeast said:
This is awkward. It's the X360 sales that should be 50% higher than the PS3 sales, not the other way around!

My world view is falling apart.

People seem to forget that they are also gettign sales from Sony's PSP system which surely had to help push the sales in Sony's favor. Activision never once said they would not support PSP but are looking at not supporting PS3. I'm sure this is combined sales of PSP/PS3/PS2 VS Xbox 360 so it is not surprising that Sony's are higher. Only a Sony fanboy can't see this.



 How our favorite systems are just like humans and sometimes have issues finding their special someone...

Xbox 360 wants to KinectPS3 wants to Move!  Why are both systems having such relationship problems?  The reason is they both become so infactuated with desire while watching the Wii as it waggles on by. They simply want what they can't have.

 Official member of the Xbox 360 Squad

Mendicate Bias said:

@CGI

Why is it you always reply to the person responding to the fanboy post but not the original post its self? After a straight forward debate its clear that the op is completely misleading and that the revenue stream for EA is in reality Wii>360>PS3. Now the thread creator not changing the op or any of his subsequent posts to reflect that and BHR-3's post, a known PS3 fanboy, are clear attempts at minor trolling. So again, why do you single out the respondee that has a basis for his refute and not the original troll post?



 



Zizzla_Rachet said:
Mendicate Bias said:

@CGI

Why is it you always reply to the person responding to the fanboy post but not the original post its self? After a straight forward debate its clear that the op is completely misleading and that the revenue stream for EA is in reality Wii>360>PS3. Now the thread creator not changing the op or any of his subsequent posts to reflect that and BHR-3's post, a known PS3 fanboy, are clear attempts at minor trolling. So again, why do you single out the respondee that has a basis for his refute and not the original troll post?

Whatever that's supposed to mean....O_o



                                                                                                                                            

Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
Mendicate Bias said:

@CGI

Why is it you always reply to the person responding to the fanboy post but not the original post its self? After a straight forward debate its clear that the op is completely misleading and that the revenue stream for EA is in reality Wii>360>PS3. Now the thread creator not changing the op or any of his subsequent posts to reflect that and BHR-3's post, a known PS3 fanboy, are clear attempts at minor trolling. So again, why do you single out the respondee that has a basis for his refute and not the original troll post?

In Spartan's case, he may be wrong, I'm not disputing that. I just saw the hypocrisy is Heruamon's post and quoted it.

And you're still just yapping without any specific details...not to mention the fact that the OP is completely WRONG and the author is still riding his delusional wave...



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder

heruamon said:
CGI-Quality said:
Mendicate Bias said:

@CGI

Why is it you always reply to the person responding to the fanboy post but not the original post its self? After a straight forward debate its clear that the op is completely misleading and that the revenue stream for EA is in reality Wii>360>PS3. Now the thread creator not changing the op or any of his subsequent posts to reflect that and BHR-3's post, a known PS3 fanboy, are clear attempts at minor trolling. So again, why do you single out the respondee that has a basis for his refute and not the original troll post?

In Spartan's case, he may be wrong, I'm not disputing that. I just saw the hypocrisy is Heruamon's post and quoted it.

And you're still just yapping without any specific details...not to mention the fact that the OP is completely WRONG and the author is still riding his delusional wave...

The OP probably is wrong, ok? What would you like for me to do about it? You just keep "yapping" about how wrong the OP is. So be it, it's wrong.... Happy now?



                                                                                                                                            

CGI-Quality said:
heruamon said:
CGI-Quality said:
Mendicate Bias said:

@CGI

Why is it you always reply to the person responding to the fanboy post but not the original post its self? After a straight forward debate its clear that the op is completely misleading and that the revenue stream for EA is in reality Wii>360>PS3. Now the thread creator not changing the op or any of his subsequent posts to reflect that and BHR-3's post, a known PS3 fanboy, are clear attempts at minor trolling. So again, why do you single out the respondee that has a basis for his refute and not the original troll post?

In Spartan's case, he may be wrong, I'm not disputing that. I just saw the hypocrisy is Heruamon's post and quoted it.

And you're still just yapping without any specific details...not to mention the fact that the OP is completely WRONG and the author is still riding his delusional wave...

The OP probably is wrong, ok? What would you like for me to do about it? You just keep "yapping" about how wrong the OP is. So be it, it's wrong.... Happy now?


Nope...please show me how I've done the same thing...as you said...it's one thing to be a fanboy...Whic on MANY ocassions I've stated that I am...but where have I continued to post false info...after I'd been corrected on multiple ocassions?  That's the issue here...it's clear that the OP source info was bum...it was pointed out, and you can't correct it, but he's STILL stating that people pointing this out are delusional (the whole denial comment), and you're knocking me, and folks pointing this out....HUH????



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder

heruamon said:
CGI-Quality said:
heruamon said:
CGI-Quality said:
Mendicate Bias said:

@CGI

Why is it you always reply to the person responding to the fanboy post but not the original post its self? After a straight forward debate its clear that the op is completely misleading and that the revenue stream for EA is in reality Wii>360>PS3. Now the thread creator not changing the op or any of his subsequent posts to reflect that and BHR-3's post, a known PS3 fanboy, are clear attempts at minor trolling. So again, why do you single out the respondee that has a basis for his refute and not the original troll post?

In Spartan's case, he may be wrong, I'm not disputing that. I just saw the hypocrisy is Heruamon's post and quoted it.

And you're still just yapping without any specific details...not to mention the fact that the OP is completely WRONG and the author is still riding his delusional wave...

The OP probably is wrong, ok? What would you like for me to do about it? You just keep "yapping" about how wrong the OP is. So be it, it's wrong.... Happy now?


Nope...please show me how I've done the same thing...as you said...it's one thing to be a fanboy...Whic on MANY ocassions I've stated that I am...but where have I continued to post false info...after I'd been corrected on multiple ocassions?  That's the issue here...it's clear that the OP source info was bum...it was pointed out, and you can't correct it, but he's STILL stating that people pointing this out are delusional (the whole denial comment), and you're knocking me, and folks pointing this out....HUH????

I didn't say you created inaccurate thread topics. Just that if you're going to get on someone for "fanboy nonsense", when you are guilty of such behavior (and admit to it), how is that not hypocritical? I'm not calling you a "fanboy" btw, I detest that word. Beyond that, you're entitled to favor whatever you choose, I have no disrespect for that. I'm just saying that if you admit to being one-sided, then you can't fault others for similar behavior. Now the OP may be inaccurate, and if so, I suggest the topic creator re-evaluate his thread-creating tactics

Nevertheless, I was just trying to get my specific point across about the "fanboy" comment. If you were offended in anyway, I apologize whole-heartedly. Hopefully the misunderstanding is cleared up.



                                                                                                                                            

so much fighting

so what if PS3 is actually a success for a company

why so much bickering, why so much hate for it?