mrstickball said:
Pyramid Head said:
akuseru said:
mrstickball said: I don't get it.
You bought a USED Xbox 360 that was very old and certainly ran the risk of being a major issue. Now your complaining it red ringed?
I'm suprised such a fan of the 360 wouldn't understand that. I'm sorry to hear about your 360's demise, but the fact is, we all know that older 360s aren't that reliable. With a MFG date of 2006, you know, as well as I do, that it's a very old system, and can RROD on you.
My advice? Buy an arcade. Jaspers are very reliable (and you should know this). |
LOL @ bolded/underlined...
My NES from the late 80s/early 90s is an old system, still works after YEARS of play.
My SNES from the mid-90s is an old system, still works after YEARS of play.
My N64 from the late 90s is an old system, still works after YEARS of play.
My GC from the early 2000s is a middle-age system, still works after YEARS of play.
My PS2 from the early 2000s is a middle-age system, still works after YEARS of play.
My PS3 from the year of 2006 is a NEW system, still works after 3 years of play.
Under no circumstances can any 360 be considered an OLD system, nor a VERY old system as you state. The fact that you actually write something like that is fascinating...
OT: There is a reason I don't have a 360, and especially knowing about the failures, I would never buy one. "Oh noez! I miss some games that can only be played on the 360!!!". Don't really bother me to miss some games. Been there, done that... I can't believe people still come back, or even buy new systems while sending in their RROD ones. Even after 1,2,3,4 even 5 RRODs!! For me this is a huge puzzle (and yes I know someone will say: "because of awesome games, etc we continue to buy")... I guess there are plenty of "double sales" in MS 360 sales data..
|
that is beyond true. how is 2006 an old system?
im xclamping, and if it dont work, oh well
i am grabbin ps3 this weekend regbardless, as its my new online system, i'll try not to get a too old one from 2007 or nothin
|
It's old given the significant amount of changes made to the Xbox 360 in it's 4 year lifespan. There have been 3-4 significant changes which radically changed the reliability of the machine. Therefore, I consder it 'old' - Just as I would consider a large PS2 'old'.
My problem with most in this thread is the lack of understanding concerning the X360. I've been on this forum now for 2 and 1/2 years, and I've constantly had to defend 360 reliability issues. As Playstation 3 fans love to exude, 360's, before the Falcon revision, were very unreliable. I find it very suprising that people still post 'OMG, my old 360 bricked, how ever did it happen to me!?' despite the HUNDREDS of RRoD discussions we've had over the years, and the definitive statements made about how reliability on 360's fare:
- If your 360 was made before April 2007 , you stand a significant chance of it breaking once, somewhere in it's lifetime. 4/07 was when the 2nd heatsinks went in.
- If your 360 was made between April 2007 and October 2007, your 360 has the 2nd heatsink, which makes failure less likely, but not impervious.
- If your 360 was made between October 2007 and October 2008, your 360 is much more reliable due to the major Falcon revision.
- If your 360 was made since November 2008, your 360 is as reliable as a Wii or PS3 due to the Jasper model.
Again, I consider consoles made before major revisions 'old', regardless of the console. Yes, 3 years isn't old in the grand scheme of console gaming history, but it is for the 360, and any major console that shipped with significant issues (such as the PS1).
|