By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Faux News Strikes Again!

Nirvana_Nut85 on 20 April 2009

 Fox Launches Infowars.com Clone Website in Attempt to Cannibalize the Patriot Movement

 

 TruthAlliance.net
Monday, April 20, 2009

 

 The “Freedom Movement” is gaining momentum, thanks to the Ron Paul Revolution and the power of syndicate radio and film.  Like synchronized swimmers, FOX news pundits spanning radio and tv have done a 180, talking non-stop about the constitution, gun rights and Ron Paul. Glen Beck has gone so far as to organize the 9/12 campaign and tea party tax protests and Anne Coulter likes Ron Paul all of sudden. Freaky twilight zone or hardcore psychological op?

Well now here is the kicker, you’re one click away from becoming the “FOX nation”. The Foxnation.com website is the most blatant attempt yet at how the Right Wing paradigm is trying to reabsorb all of the elements of conservative society who saw through Bush. The very same “fringe” they were just months ago calling  radical, and saying deserved to be in camps.

The site layout and their “slanted content” is exactly like infowars.com, how low and parasitic these criminals will stoop to maintain control over the political paradigm is astounding to say the least. Unfortunately to them the true patriots of this country will own the boards on this site and FOXnation.com will simply be a nexus point in the battle. Education for the FOXoholic’s will be swift, and will serve only to dethrone what little if any credibility FOX news ever had.

Lets have a real Tea Party and dump the affront to liberty that is FOX News and quick.



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

Around the Network
Nirvana_Nut85 on 20 April 2009

As a Infowars supporter I find this really appauling, also it pisses me off that alot of people have been decieved to believe that it was faux news and the republicans who organized the Tea Parties when all those morons just supported them to try and regain credibility.

If people would do there homework they would find that it was the 9/11 truthers and Ron Paul supporters who started the movement.



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

akuma587 on 20 April 2009

Hey, but they told me they were Fair and Balanced? What gives!



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Kasz216 on 20 April 2009
akuma587 said:
Hey, but they told me they were Fair and Balanced? What gives!

The scariest thing... according to the Pew society they had the most fair and balanced election coverage...

and yeah... I wasn't seeing it.

24 hour for profit news stations just don't work.  They have to run far to one side to get viewers... and in doing so fuck up the actual news.

 



akuma587 on 20 April 2009

That's pretty funny.

Honestly, I don't see why people watch a show or a channel where they agree with everything that is said. I'll give an example, The Stephanie Miller Show. I had to stop listening to it because it was nothing but people talking about how right Democrats are and how wrong Republicans are. I may be a pretty big Democrat, but I don't like just hearing one side of the debate. Its no fun and gets boring!

NPR's All Things Considered is by far my favorite news program. Its the best news program in existence if you ask me.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Around the Network
Kasz216 on 20 April 2009
akuma587 said:
That's pretty funny.

Honestly, I don't see why people watch a show or a channel where they agree with everything that is said. I'll give an example, The Stephanie Miller Show. I had to stop listening to it because it was nothing but people talking about how right Democrats are and how wrong Republicans are. I may be a pretty big Democrat, but I don't like just hearing one side of the debate. Its no fun and gets boring!

NPR's All Things Considered is by far my favorite news program. Its the best news program in existence if you ask me.

Yeah.   I think it's because Fox News hated John McCain anyway... so they ran the most "fair" coverage by bitching about both of them.

 

Personally my favorite news coverage was MSNBCs... when they teamed up Pat Buchanon with... I forget her name.  She's got her own show now.

Either way.  They were like the odd couple.  Really disagreed.  Really went at each other.... but also were willing to admit when their candidate screwed up.

 



akuma587 on 20 April 2009

Yeah...I don't really understand why some of them hated McCain so much. Did they really think a bible-thumping, hardcore Republican could have won in that kind of political climate? I thought what held McCain back was running what I would call a "traditional" Republican campaign. He conceded the economy and healthcare from the start and decided to focus on the military and a hawkish foreign policy.  And then he was kind of backed into being socially conservative as well. He would at least have had more of a fighting chance if he wouldn't have looked like such an amateur on economic issues.

This is the way I look at it. During an election, you should not pander to your base once the primary is over. The base is so loyal to your party that they are going to vote for you anyways no matter how much they piss and moan. You risk a lot more by pandering to your base than not trying to reach out to independents, who ALWAYS decide the election. You can't win a national election just with votes from your own party.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Kasz216 on 20 April 2009
akuma587 said:
Yeah...I don't really understand why some of them hated McCain so much. Did they really think a bible-thumping, hardcore Republican could have won in that kind of political climate? I thought what held McCain back was running what I would call a "traditional" Republican campaign. He conceded the economy and healthcare from the start and decided to focus on the military. He would at least have had more of a fighting chance if he wouldn't have looked like such an amateur on economic issues.

This is the way I look at it. During an election, you should not pander to your base once the primary is over. The base is so loyal to your party that they are going to vote for you anyways no matter how much they piss and moan. You risk a lot more by pandering to your base than not trying to reach out to independents, who ALWAYS decide the election. You can't win a national election just with votes from your own party.

I agere.  He should of went with his gut and went with Liberman as his running mate.  A lot of democrats demified him... but he still was a popular figure.


I mean hell he survived the anti-sematic attacks against him when Gore lost against Bush.   "Gore only lost because he had that jewish guy running with him" was a surprisingly common accusation.

Which is all the more ironic considering that just 8 years later a black man would be elected.


McCain went to far left in 2000... and he overcompensated by going to far right in 2008...

and it's not even that he went to far left in 2000... as it was a bunch of people though he had an illegitamite black baby.

How people couldn't see what the Bush presidency would be after that... i'll never know.



akuma587 on 20 April 2009
Kasz216 said:
.


McCain went to far left in 2000... and he overcompensated by going to far right in 2008...

and it's not even that he went to far left in 2000... as it was a bunch of people though he had an illegitamite black baby.

How people couldn't see what the Bush presidency would be after that... i'll never know.

Absolutely.  The political climate was much different then, but McCain would have most likely won if he would have gotten the nomination.

The black baby story was such a damn joke.  Thank Karl Rove and Co. for that one.  At least Karl Rove was smart enough to know that invading Iraq was a bad idea.  That was mostly Cheney pushing that issue.

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Kasz216 on 20 April 2009
akuma587 said:
Kasz216 said:
.


McCain went to far left in 2000... and he overcompensated by going to far right in 2008...

and it's not even that he went to far left in 2000... as it was a bunch of people though he had an illegitamite black baby.

How people couldn't see what the Bush presidency would be after that... i'll never know.

Absolutely.  The political climate was much different then, but McCain would have most likely won if he would have gotten the nomination.

The black baby story was such a damn joke.  Thank Karl Rove and Co. for that one.  At least Karl Rove was smart enough to know that invading Iraq was a bad idea.  That was mostly Cheney pushing that issue.

 

I don't really blame Karl Rove.  I mean it was his job to think up that kind of stuff.   I blame Bush for actually saying "Yeah lets do this."

As for Iraq... it could be Cheney.  I don't know cheney is weird.  Could never figure out his motivation.  People say he made Oil deals for money... yet all that money ended up being donated to charity... and nobody even really knows that.  Then he had all the super secretive stuff... I don't know what his deal was.

My guess was he was head of all of the "Black ops" crap.  Like torture, destablization of unfriendly governments etc..


Iraq really seemed to more be G Gordon Liddy and some other guy who's name i'm forgetting.  They're the ones who funneled the right intellegence to bush.