Quantcast
Graphics: Resident Evil 5 360 > Killzone 2?

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Graphics: Resident Evil 5 360 > Killzone 2?

Jeronimo66 said:

I go off my eyes and VGA has a sharper cleaner look for games for than HDMI, I will listen to the technicalities, but in the end I go with what I see and VGA looks better to me than HDMI for games.

 

I guess depending on the quality of your old crt, then yes you might get a "cleaner" picture, but with newer/current monitors that support hdmi/dvi, vga isn't going to cut it, especially past the 720p perspective (where 640x480 is its standard).

 Also, I've looked at comparisons and generally the higher resolutions (ie 720p-1080p+) vga degrades exponentially, considering that vga is analog, while dvi/hdmi a is digital signal, [to quote wikipedias artical]

"It is designed for carrying uncompressed digital video data to a display."

Also 

"Previous standards such as the analog VGA were designed for CRT-based devices and thus did not use discrete time display addressing. As the analog source transmits each horizontal line of the image, it varies its output voltage to represent the desired brightness. In a CRT device, this is used to vary the intensity of the scanning beam as it moves across the screen."

Take it as you like :/



RAWR SEND IT IN A'S .RAWR PLZ

Around the Network
Pristine20 said:
I don't even find RE5 to be visually impressive at all. then again, I've only seen the ps3 version, maybe it really is that much worse than it's 360 counterpart LMAO. Regardless of how gorgeous RE5 may be on the 360 which I can't seem to see thanks to the "lousy" ps3, I highly doubt that a game that just released and has been in development for years prior and isn't remotely owned by M$, is their so-called proof that 360 is more powerful. And if RE is the end all, of graphics, it frankly is a pathetic attempt at such a proof.

@OP

You seem to have this idea that you're speaking for the voiceless 360 and keep making all these flamebait threads. Good luck lasting on the site!

Flamebait threads?

All I am doing is stating how I feel, and I didn't disrespect anybody or try to make anybody feel bad so I don't see where my threads are flamebait, speaking up about something when enough people is not does not mean flamebait.

 



XxXProphecyXxX said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Bit late for jokes now dude don't you think?...even if you compare RE5 to uncharted( a 2007 game) it still can't match uncharted then how can you even compare RE5 to KZ2?...how would I know?? I own both and finished both games.

There are still people like you?

Uncharted has been out performed by many  multiplat and exclusive  games , basically every multiplat game that comes out now looks better than uncharted. It was good for its time but its 2009 , get your head straight

RE5 looks infinitely better than uncharted but KZ2 looks better than RE5(its NOT the best looking console game).

 

Ummm...ok good to know...for me Uncharted(detail,envirionment,coulours,water effect, etc) > RE5(character model, mixed of high and low res texture)

 

Ok but thats just it , its just you.....

 



N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!

KZ2 is half a generation ahead on Water effects, motion blur, explosions , particle effects , lighting etc. The water in RE5 is horrible



On the VGA subject guys you're all missing the point a little. VGA has been fine for years on PC's at resolutions that far exceed those of our current consoles. On some TV sets the actual TV can handle a VGA signal better than HDMI, then there is also the small matter of 1:1 pixel mapping that can produce a sharper image too. Then there is the fact that many people who have HD TV's are running sets that are a few years old so do not have mature HDMI tech in them.

In theory HDMI should be better in everyway, in practice that's not always the case.

OT - Even if a game came out that did surpass Killzone 2 on the 360, the loudest critics of the 360 would never admit it anyway. How many people claimed Resistance 2 would be better graphically than Gears 2, don't see many of those around these days. The goal posts are always moving and Killzone 2 will be surpassed by both HD consoles imo, not that it matters as its the enjoyment a gamer gets thats the important factor.



Around the Network

Can't see how that's possible for two reasons.

1. I played Resident Evil 5, wasn't nearly as good Killzone 2 - I didn't hear anything about 360 version being better then the PS3 version

2. Not one reviewer or even poster has mentioned this, and they love to stir that kinda shit up



jesus kung fu magic said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Bit late for jokes now dude don't you think?...even if you compare RE5 to uncharted( a 2007 game) it still can't match uncharted then how can you even compare RE5 to KZ2?...how would I know?? I own both and finished both games.

There are still people like you?

Uncharted has been out performed by many  multiplat and exclusive  games , basically every multiplat game that comes out now looks better than uncharted. It was good for its time but its 2009 , get your head straight

RE5 looks infinitely better than uncharted but KZ2 looks better than RE5(its NOT the best looking console game).

 

Ummm...ok good to know...for me Uncharted(detail,envirionment,coulours,water effect, etc) > RE5(character model, mixed of high and low res texture)

 

Ok but thats just it , its just you.....

 

 

Really??? Im the only person in the world who thinks Uncharted looks better than RE5?? WOW facinating that you know evry thing.



I too think Uncharted looks better in certain areas than RE5. Animation. Water effects blows away RE5. Depth of field. RE5 character models are better, Uncharted lighting looks better too.



slowmo said:
On the VGA subject guys you're all missing the point a little. VGA has been fine for years on PC's at resolutions that far exceed those of our current consoles. On some TV sets the actual TV can handle a VGA signal better than HDMI, then there is also the small matter of 1:1 pixel mapping that can produce a sharper image too. Then there is the fact that many people who have HD TV's are running sets that are a few years old so do not have mature HDMI tech in them.

In theory HDMI should be better in everyway, in practice that's not always the case.

OT - Even if a game came out that did surpass Killzone 2 on the 360, the loudest critics of the 360 would never admit it anyway. How many people claimed Resistance 2 would be better graphically than Gears 2, don't see many of those around these days. The goal posts are always moving and Killzone 2 will be surpassed by both HD consoles imo, not that it matters as its the enjoyment a gamer gets thats the important factor.

 

 At least someone sees my point on VGA.



XxXProphecyXxX said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Bit late for jokes now dude don't you think?...even if you compare RE5 to uncharted( a 2007 game) it still can't match uncharted then how can you even compare RE5 to KZ2?...how would I know?? I own both and finished both games.

There are still people like you?

Uncharted has been out performed by many  multiplat and exclusive  games , basically every multiplat game that comes out now looks better than uncharted. It was good for its time but its 2009 , get your head straight

RE5 looks infinitely better than uncharted but KZ2 looks better than RE5(its NOT the best looking console game).

 

Ummm...ok good to know...for me Uncharted(detail,envirionment,coulours,water effect, etc) > RE5(character model, mixed of high and low res texture)

 

Ok but thats just it , its just you.....

 

 

Really??? Im the only person in the world who thinks Uncharted looks better than RE5?? WOW facinating that you know evry thing.

 

 Well im not the J man for no reason....(and I have eyes)



N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!