drunken0taku said: i never stated YOU said that in my reply so maybe you didn't read what i wrote. not that it matters, you obviously have your mind made up on the subject. just to let you know this isn't the only gaming forum on the interwebs so don't act like i don't hear the same ish everywhere else i go. your condescending attitude is not a forceful argument in itself. carry on. |
Huh?
Like I said, Sony was the one touting PlayStation(R)Home as one of the big reasons why the PS3 was superior, and despite their bragging, it took them nearly two years AFTER BRAGGING to get a half-ass BETA released. Yes, what I said is a fact... it's half-ass and incomplete.
It doesn't mean that HOME won't be great someday, it very well could be... but it's not great right now.
When we discuss this subject in THIS forum, I usually tell Sony Fanboys that while I do like my PS3, I still prefer my 360 because of XBOX Live, and those people tell me, "Hey man, just wait 'til they release HOME man, you ain't seen nothing yet".
I have rode on the fence for a long time, because Sony and their wonderful fanbase has been telling me (no, shoving down my throat) the idea that HOME will be the LIVE killer. So, why after nearly two years am I still only getting a crap-BETA version if it is so great? That's all I am asking.
I swear that Sony's nickname should be the "someday" company. The PS3 will sell big "someday" (read: 10-year plan here), the PSN will be a great service "someday"... That's all that Sony is this generation, a company that continues to advertise what they will be, and conveniently ignore the here and now.