You've asked to have sieanr banned, Kwaad? Why? I mean, sure some of his responses aren't very productive, but neither are your responses quite often....it's not like we try to ban you.

Damnit, shams, you just gave us away!

I dunno where this sudden influx of stupidity came from...but suddenly people are accusing me as being washimul, and now Kwaad as being washimul...wtf mate? While this site needs to remain open for any discussion...certain people do need to be banned...it's getting ridiculous.

[quote]Kwaad said: your mother said: Kwaad said: I didnt ask for a ban. Just brought up a few... issues. :) Liar liar pants on fire! Straight from the "undownloadble horse in Oblivion for PS3's mouth": "PS:You should be banned for your 1,363,993 byte signature. PS: Moderators should be changed because of sieanr's 1,363,993 byte signature that's been there for a week." That's pretty bad memory there, Kwaad; you only posted that remark what, yesterday? And this time, please don't pull your "IF YOU CALL ME A LIAR WELL THEN GO FUCK YOURSELF" routine - unless, of course, your definition of "banned" differs from the English standard. Might want to lay off those hallucination-inducing drugs your favorite electronics manufacturer has been slipping into your tea... I said that. But it was something called. Scarcasm. I'm talking about E-MAIL. that is the key word in there. I said You should be banned. Not 'BAN HIM'. My refrence about the moderators is things like that make me hate the forums... I'm not always on my broadband. And not all my devices can block images. (basically my broadband is the only one that can do it) >.

sieanr - edit your post and fix the scripting. it will keep the info. :) Just a helpful post. Wont make sense after he fixes it. EDIT: Remove the >. from the quote. It is killing the scripting.