By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Join the only boycott that matters!

MontanaHatchet said:
This whole "quality of games" crap is getting so damn annoying and confusing.

Bad games should be gone, but they're so busy expanding the industry.

Casual games could be made good, but it wouldn't matter because a low score will always be blamed on the reviewer because he or she has played games for more than a couple years.

Besides, how could they be made good when they're usually made by a small company on a cheap budget?

There's two spins, twists, and turns on every side of the matter. No matter what you say, there's an opposing opinion that delves into a deeper yet irrelevant subject.

 Plus its sometimes a matter of opinion on what game is bad like Bad Reviews on Haze people start bad mouthing it even tho they themselfs haven't playied it yet someone will tell you "Hey...I liked that game".



Incert Witty Comment on how i'm a fanboy of all systems including PC here.

Around the Network
Raziel Dune said:
MontanaHatchet said:
This whole "quality of games" crap is getting so damn annoying and confusing.

Bad games should be gone, but they're so busy expanding the industry.

Casual games could be made good, but it wouldn't matter because a low score will always be blamed on the reviewer because he or she has played games for more than a couple years.

Besides, how could they be made good when they're usually made by a small company on a cheap budget?

There's two spins, twists, and turns on every side of the matter. No matter what you say, there's an opposing opinion that delves into a deeper yet irrelevant subject.

Plus its sometimes a matter of opinion on what game is bad like Bad Reviews on Haze people start bad mouthing it even tho they themselfs haven't playied it yet someone will tell you "Hey...I liked that game".


 Haze might not be a good game, but no way is it a "BAD" game by any mean... Heck, I wouldn't even consider "LAIR" a bad game..

 

Chicken Shoot... now that's a bad game. 



Soriku (Feb 10/08): In 5 years the PS3/360 will be dead.

KH3 bet: "If KH3 comes to Wii exclusive, I will take a 1 month of sig/avatar by otheres open a thread apologize and praise you guys' brilliance." http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?start=50&id=18379
Original cast: Badonkadonkhr, sc94597 allaboutthegames885, kingofwale, Soriku, ctk495, skeezer, RDBRaptor, Mirson,

Episode 1: OOPSY!
selnor
: Too Human I even expect 3-4 mill entire life and 500,000 first day. GoW2 ( expect 7 - 9 million entire life and over 2 mill first day), Fable 2 (expect 5-6 million entire life and 1.5 mill fist day) BK3 (expect 4 - 5 mill sales entire life and 1 mill first day).. Tales/IU/TLR should get to 2 or 3 million! post id: 868878
Episode 2:
Letsdance: FFXIII (PS3+360) first week in NA = 286K
According to pre-order rate in week 13 (post id: 2902544)
Raziel Dune said:
MontanaHatchet said:
This whole "quality of games" crap is getting so damn annoying and confusing.

Bad games should be gone, but they're so busy expanding the industry.

Casual games could be made good, but it wouldn't matter because a low score will always be blamed on the reviewer because he or she has played games for more than a couple years.

Besides, how could they be made good when they're usually made by a small company on a cheap budget?

There's two spins, twists, and turns on every side of the matter. No matter what you say, there's an opposing opinion that delves into a deeper yet irrelevant subject.

Plus its sometimes a matter of opinion on what game is bad like Bad Reviews on Haze people start bad mouthing it even tho they themselfs haven't playied it yet someone will tell you "Hey...I liked that game".

Exactly. A lot of reviews were negative towards Imagine: Babies. Of course, it probably was a bad game and just average casual crap. But it sold very well, and I'm sure that the demographic it was aimed towards enjoyed it. 

 



 

 

MontanaHatchet said:
Raziel Dune said:
MontanaHatchet said:
This whole "quality of games" crap is getting so damn annoying and confusing.

Bad games should be gone, but they're so busy expanding the industry.

Casual games could be made good, but it wouldn't matter because a low score will always be blamed on the reviewer because he or she has played games for more than a couple years.

Besides, how could they be made good when they're usually made by a small company on a cheap budget?

There's two spins, twists, and turns on every side of the matter. No matter what you say, there's an opposing opinion that delves into a deeper yet irrelevant subject.

Plus its sometimes a matter of opinion on what game is bad like Bad Reviews on Haze people start bad mouthing it even tho they themselfs haven't playied it yet someone will tell you "Hey...I liked that game".

Exactly. A lot of reviews were negative towards Imagine: Babies. Of course, it probably was a bad game and just average casual crap. But it sold very well, and I'm sure that the demographic it was aimed towards enjoyed it.

 


On the other hand, 50 Bulletproof sold well, and even if the game could have been enjoyable, I could see the faulty aiming and glitches just from watching gameplay videos of it.

So crap isn't just going to go away. 



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

@misterd  'Thanks what was I doing wrong'  This is the good way:


And









Around the Network

BTW, your sig is still too big, misterd. Try to make it no more than 400x200. Ask naznatips for anything further.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

konnichiwa said:
@misterd  'Thanks what was I doing wrong'  This is the good way:


And




 

:D Thanks, but I figured it out. The problem was that the url I use wasn't coming up right. When using photobucket I can't use the autocopy - have to click on the pic and copy the url directly.

 



misterd said:
RolStoppable said:
No, beer has to be stopped first.

 

I suspect beer plays a large part in the creation of bad games.

 


But beer can make bad games seem good.

Not to get all theoretical here, but theoretically bad games are determined by good games. Meaning if all the bad games were "ridden" of then you'd rate the left over games on the same scale. Narrowing it down a bad game would be something we'd rate in the 80's now. Meaning technically it is impossible to get rid of bad games cause quality in our world is based on a scale that is not proportional to how the actual title is but more or less in relation to the entire market itself. Meaning for their to be good games, theoretically there has to be bad games.



izaaz101 said:
misterd said:
RolStoppable said:
No, beer has to be stopped first.

 

I suspect beer plays a large part in the creation of bad games.

 


But beer can make bad games seem good.

And let you see everywhere pretty woman (when they were in fact all guys)...  Ugh the memories!