DOATS1 said:
gebx said:
PooperScooper said: I love how people present personal prefrence as fact.
Why compare warhawk to frontlines? why not compare it to ... ulgh... shadowrun....
fact of the matter you guys say "360 is da best" and i say r&c, uncharted, warhawk, resistance, heavenly sword are better than halo, mass effect, crackdown, gears of war, viva pinata, shadow run, hell raising, and bioshock |
Bolded part is the problem... it's not us 360 fanboys on these forums.. its the F**King INDUSTRY!! The critics and reviewers! Games that have a 75% or higher average on metacritic.com 360 - 152 PS3 - 69 |
bad, bad defence me friend. i can't believe somebody hasn't ripped this to shreds yet. how could you possibly use this some kind of arguement?? 360 HAS MORE GAMES to get rated, how can you compare? 360 porbably has double the library the ps3 does, there's a reason for that too: it's been out a year longer. they don't have even near the same amount of games so how could you use this as any sort of evidence? |
ZOMG!! The 360 has been out a year longer? No way! Remain calm, I will address the issue..
Announcement: TO ALL NEW 360 USERS!! PLEASE IGNORE ANY GAMES THATS BEEN RELEASED BEFORE THE PS3! Thank You
@Pooperscooper, Doats, and whoever else
We, 360 gaming users/Fanboys/Hardcore gamers, judge gaming consoles by the quality of its games library, We use websites such as Metacritic.com and Gamerankings.com, to demonstrate our point. Of course the 360 will have more games because its been out longer, we're not denying it, we're sticking it in your face.
Now if people here are unhappy about how games are reviewed by the media then do something about it. Start websites and start judging 360 games and be counted on M.com and G.com, and then your personal opinions will actually mean something.