By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Xbox One X will launch for $499

 

Your thoughts?

TOO HIGH! 544 73.81%
 
Is actually a decent price 131 17.77%
 
For 4k gaming? Steal 62 8.41%
 
Total:737

$499 with a Zen upgrade and all would be fine.

Hell, I'd take $499 with Zen and 4TF in a HEARTBEAT over $399 with Jaguar and 6TF. Resolution means less and less to me above 1080p, but high FPS would be nice. Sadly, both PS4P and X1X are still tied to Jag :/



Around the Network

I'm trying my hardest not to be a poor sport, but all the $399 talk right up through Geoff's tweets sure was amusing. This is the price I expected so it was yet one more nonsurprise at the conference. The compactness of the console is impressive, though.



Unpopular opinion...but I think this is a bit too expensive for what I want out of it.

Just my opinion though...I won't push it on anyone. :)



NNID: Zephyr25 / PSN: Zephyr--25 / Switch: SW-4450-3680-7334

for what it can do........ dirt cheap, it'd take over twice the cost to build a PC that can compare



http://imageshack.com/a/img801/6426/f7pc.gif

^Yes that's me ripping it up in the GIF. :)

Super_Boom said:
Unpopular opinion...but I think this is a bit too expensive for what I want out of it.

Just my opinion though...I won't push it on anyone. :)

that's the general consensus . not really an unpopular opinion. 



Around the Network
Hiku said:
binary solo said:
Sensible in the longterm perspective. Profitability of the Xbox is more important than number of units sold and it's clear XOS will be an important unit for entry-level buyers for a few years yet. They possibly looked at PS4 vs PS4P sales and realised that the premium unit is not going to supersede the base unit in sales volume, so there is no point trying to take a volume approach to XOX at the cost of profitability.

Yeah, either they looked at Sony or came to that conlusion themselves, because Sony seemed to reach that conclusion without any prior reference, and they were correct. Pro is selling just slightly better than they expected. Although MS are aiming at a slightly more hardcore audience than Sony perhaps. But I still think the audience is very limited.

People will say that XBOX is DOA, but if it meets MS's sales expectations, even if they are as low as Sony's expectations of the Pro, it will do what it was designed to do.
But at $499 there's a question if even 1 out of 5 Xbox units sold will be an Xbox X. Or whatever MS are expecting.

The MS guys are smart enough to have come to that conclusion even before PS4P went on sale. But their conclusion has been well validated by PS4Ps share of over all PS4 sales. So I think they are probably more confident in their price point becaus of Sony's experience with PS4P, despite some disappointed Xbox fans who thought XOX could actually get Xbox to start winning the sales war. But to me it seems like MS taking a more mature approach to its position in console hardware and hopefully not engaging in the immature sales war.

As a business that is not the slightest bit reliant on Xbox hardware for profits, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being the number 2 console, even by a wide margin. So long as sales reach a level that helps MS's overall strategic objectives it doesn't really matter where they land in unit sales compared to PS and Nintendo. Sony and Nintendo on the other hand are far more reliant on console hardware install base for profitability. Nintendo is wholly reliant. So those companies need a higher critical mass of sales to meet strategic objectives than MS does. MS should see this lower KPI as a strength and realise that the effort needed to get the marginal benefit of selling 60 million consoles in a genetation compared to selling 40 million is really rather wasted.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Kerotan said:

that's the general consensus . not really an unpopular opinion. 

 

Hiku said:

That's the popular opinion. Most gamers will not buy an Xbox X. Not even most Xbox fans will.

Dumb inside joke...the people that would get it don't seem to be here. :P



NNID: Zephyr25 / PSN: Zephyr--25 / Switch: SW-4450-3680-7334

CGI-Quality said:

.....and mine Day 1!

Me too! It's actually cheaper than I expected. Only $650 AUD.

Should be able to get $150 for my crappy old launch Xbox One.

Lafiel said:

accurate price for a 360mm² 16nm process APU with a liquid cooling system, 12GB of GDDR5 ram and power management to make every chip run at it's optimal power state

but in the console business this historically hasn't been much of a mass market price

It's not a liquid cooling system in the traditional sense. It's vapour chamber cooling with a blower fan. Please don't give people the wrong idea.

The Xbox One had a chip that was 363mm2. The S variant reduced that by 33%.
Scorpio at 360mm2~ isn't new ground for Microsoft.


5drew00 said:
Switch is $200 less than Xbox One X which is why Switch will keep selling out and X will not sell.

Clearly you don't fully understand what Scorpio is meant for if you think that.

The Xbox One S isn't going away. That is the low-cost alternative.

Chris Hu said:
Not that it would make a huge difference but for $499 it should have used 14nm chips instead of 16nm chips well at least its even smaller then the X1 S.

Whhaat... You do realise it makes no real difference? They are both based on 20nm anyway.

Arkaign said:

However, X1X as well as PS4P are hobbled by fairly awful Jaguar CPUs, which will continue the heavy low-FPS in major stuff like Destiny, Wildlands, Shadow of War, almost certainly RDR2, etc.

So the 'power' gamers would be more likely to just go to PC and play at 60FPS+ right?

Missing one tiny point though. Which Digital Foundry elaborated on.

Allot of processing that is typically done on the CPU to drive graphics... Is gone. It's done on the GPU's command processor now.
Sure, it's the same garbage Jaguar... But it is clocked higher, it does less work. It's not apples to apples with the other consoles.

SuperBott said:

no thanks for a checkerboard 4K

Scorpio supports checkerboard.

thismeintiel said:

Definitely agree.  This isn't going to hurt the PS4 at all. 

Sony has the Generation locked in.
Sony simply executed better than Microsoft at every step this generation and they were awarded for that with great sales.

The Switch is also doing well, bringing up the rear.

I think if anyone was expecting Scorpio to set the world on fire and shift 10's of millions of devices, then they were seriously not understanding it's market  positioning. If Sony isn't pulling crazy sales with the Pro, it's understandable the same would translate to Scorpio.

Super_Boom said:
Unpopular opinion...but I think this is a bit too expensive for what I want out of it.

Just my opinion though...I won't push it on anyone. :)

Your opinion is resonating with allot of people at the moment. So it is a fair assessment.

I'm not to bothered by the price personally. $650 AUD is perfectly reasonable, I actually expected it higher.




--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Radek said:
Thats too much, and Anthem is on PS4 too, so is Metro, Assassins Creed, Shadow of War and Life is Strange 2

Quality post.  Glad to know my Metro is safe.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

That'll be a tough sell in Canada until the CDN gets closer to parity. $599 plus tax (in Ontario) brings it to $676.87. Can't​ see that moving off shelves quickly.



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"