Fair enough. I'm totally sympathetic to folks who see the price tag as too high. This is an expensive hobby and I'd never begrudge someone being careful with his/her money.

But just as many of us, myself included, wrongly believed $300 to be too high a price tag for Switch, I think we're also underestimating the appeal of a title like USFII. We're people who are buying dozens of games a year, stretched thin across multiple subscription services, accessories, and season passes. Meanwhile, someone who hasn't owned a console in a decade or more looks at Switch at $300 and sees a steal. The same is probably the case for a game like USFII.

Jesus, how? First 1-2 Switch is doing better than it ever should have and now SFII......how?

Remember people once said the same of the NS' price, he's right in what he says in that it has an appeal that isn't affected by reviews, like the NS players are already well aware of what's in the package and made up their minds long before reviews were even a factor. I have a feeling a number of NS games may end up following this trend due to the NS attracting this type of audience.

I am willing to put down great money for my hobby, but i'm still playing BOTW. I would have bought it already if it were 20 now. But i'll pick it up sooner or later .

Yeah £35 pound is way too much for me on a game like this plus I'm still busy with Botw

Was Street fighter V on first place?

I don't know how, but my friend got his copy yesterday, the 25th in Puerto Rico. He might know the owner of a store or something.

So third parties do sell well on Nintendo consoles. I bet a couple of third party studios feel stupid for not having anything prepared. Not a lot of competition, so easier to get good sales with games like this.

Capcom should start porting Resident Evil VII and Street Fighter V. 

STFV no that  crap  no, but RE7 i think they are doing it rigth now.

Wouldn't it be funny if...

...you know.