Boutros said:
You sure can lol...Why couldn't they? If they can evaluate the demand correctly and accurately they can both sell a lot of units as well as ship just a little below demand to keep that hard-to-find status. Many shipments of fewer units allows to gauge that easily. I honestly can't believe people are actually denying that Nintendo has been creating artificial scarcity especially since they've been doing it forever (it goes back to the NES era). And I also don't understand why people see this as an attack to Nintendo. I think it's a brilliant strategy that few companies could pull off as well. But the first allocation of Switch being sold out doesn't mean anything yet. |
You're not serious, right? Nintendo shipped 4 million Wiis by the end of 2006, 6 million units by the end of march 2007. It was manufactured 1,2 million units a month until 6/07, after that 1,8 million units a month until 6/08 when the production was ramped up to 2,4 million units a month. Nintendo was under heavier competition in Europe, so they kept the supply on a level they didn't lose any sales by not having a supply.
I don't think it's an attack to Nintendo, as much as it being attack to my intelligence. Just yesterday I helped my 12 year old kid in his homework, and frankly, even he could do better than that, as his homework needed to correlate with the real world.
In any case, just like the guy in the video thought, why it is only Nintendo creating artificial demand when being short on supply, why not others at same situation. Why did it work for Wii but not the Wii U.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.