The Fury said:
nuckles87 said:
Going by how Square elaborated on that statement, more like FF13. It's essentially going to be a franchise. So I think just using the first game would work fine.
|
FF13 wasn't intended as a 'franchise' or continueing series though, it was a game that had 2 sequels. And don't try and convince me that was their intention, story finished in 13 and 13-2 had completely different character as main playable ones.
Mar1217 said:
With turn based battle system this time please ?
|
This is modern SquEnix we are talking about here, who just released a non-ATB FF which has sold well, they aren't making ATB ever again.
|
You do know Final Fantasy 13 was literally unveiled alongside two other Final Fantasy 13 games, right? Sure, Versus 13 and Agito 13 ended up getting renamed, but it's pretty clear that Square was intending to franchise 13 from the very beginning. 13 having a complete story doesn't really change that.
Final Fantasy 7 isn't really any different. Sure, all games will share the same world rather than just the same mythos, Square said that each game will have a complete story that will cover things from a different perspective. FF13 is a far more apt comparison then Hitman.
Even Square says 13 is their blue print for this:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/final-fantasy-7-remake-will-be-multiple-full-sized/1100-6438387/