ps3-sales! said:
I agree for the most part.
OP: I'm an American, but I have spent many years learning history from different perspectives and views.
WW2 is on my favorites to learn.
With that said, I think it was 100% justified. You had a Japanese army with limitless mental fortitude. They would not have given in so easily had we invaded via frontal assault.
We saved lives by taking lives. In no way am I excusing that we still killed many civilians. But, it could have been worse.
Drastic times do indeed call for drastic measures. I am a fan of "go hard or go home" mentality when it comes to war.
Either you attack with everything you go in order to end the war, or you don't attack at all.
This pick and choose bullshit that has plagued America in Vietnam and now the middle east will be the death of us. |
these kind of tactics don't work against terrorism. It will never work in the middle east and it's exactly why the US is having so many problems. You can't nuke your way to defeating terrorism. You can't even really bomb yourself out of terrorism, every bombing seems to only create more terrorists. Even the most carefully planned anti-terrorist measures seem to backfire in the long run. The US already did the go out all strategy in afghanistan and iraq and won the conventional war almost immediately, only to be sucked into something they only wish they could get out of. Even defeating what seems like the most evil regimes seem to have negative consequences.
currently playing: Skyward Sword, Mario Sunshine, Xenoblade Chronicles X