By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - My new AMD monster PC finally built!

Slimebeast said:
Alby_da_Wolf said:

[...]

Agree with you about the case, when I switched from desktop to mid-tower I wondered why I didn't do it before.

And gratz for your new PC, what a beast! 

Right now, not being ready for building a new PC myself (I'd go for mid-low cost and low power consumption as I always do, anyway), I just ordered a new HDD and a R7 250 with passive cooling, modest, but silent and it will run circles around my current on-board Radeon HD3300. Also, for a old PC it didn't make sense a more powerful one, and it's a sensible choice to increase performances and free some precious hundreds MB currently used by the on-board GPU besides its dedicated 128MB DDR3 sideport memory, as doubling from 4GB to 8GB DDR2 ECC main RAM would be very expensive and quite pointless, old and slow tech that would cost me like the new GPU, as it's out of production, actually I'd pay that RAM more than I did with the first 4GB that I bought when my fav online shop was doing special offers on Kingston products.

PS When I'll build my next PC, I'll go for AMD too, although I won't choose top absolute performances for the CPU, but top of the low-power consumption range.


Thank you.

AMD 4 Life!

When you say you're gonna build your next PC, you're already planning one after the one you just ordered parts to (R7 250)?

What games do you play at the moment?

Well, on the portable I'm lost in Planescape:Torment, doing every sidequest in Sigil before advancing inthe main quest.
On the desktop I was lost in Morrowind sidequests, then, when I did my last upgrade I had to abandon Win 2000, due to lack of drivers, but with XP some DRM/copy protection, probably of Thief 3, managed to do far worse damages than under Win 2000, particularly to CD/DVD drivers (so that darn protection damaging the drivers couldn't see the DVD anymore and prevented me from playing), so after a while, playing Grand Prix Legends, but it was less stable too than on Win 2000, I finally switched to Win 7, but this time, to avoid problems, I'll finish Thief 3 using a DRM-free GOG version. For GPL I'll have to use a GPU-affinity tool, as it's so old that it doesn't cope well even with my modest dual-core.
With the new GPU I'll be able to play The Witcher 2, of which even the minimum specs exceeded my on board HD3300, but I'll play Gothic 2 and 3 first, then The Witcher 1, I don't want to feel like going back if I play The Witcher 1 and 2 first. In my backlog I got other games too, I got Mount&Blade, for example, that is tempting me, Mass Effect 1 and then a bunch of isometric RPGs, like Drakensang 1, 2 and expansion, Sacred 1 and 2 and Torchlight. Then I have a King Arthur collection that I don't even remember when I bought it, it had to be some special offer. I have some other racers too, like GTR and GT Legends, and rFactor 2 is in my wishlist.

But the problem is that I have no time! And when I'll finally graduate and have more time my gf wants to marry me or at least make children with me! If she won't get fed up of waiting and leave me before, that is. OMG, when I'll stop wasting time taking too long to do what I have to do, I'll end up having even less time, what kind of sick, f***ed-up universe do we live in?   

About my next PC, I still haven't decided anything in detail, except that I'll wait for low power consumption CPUs or APUs to offer a significant performance boost compared to my current PC. My new GPU will allow me to wait longer before my next major upgrade, as in my backlog The Witcher 2 is currently the most power-hungry game, this is good, because by then probably there will already be DDR4, and maybe even chipsets and mobos able to use GDDR5 also as main RAM like PS4 already does.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


Around the Network
Slimebeast said:
FinalFantasyXIII said:

Great build! AMD CPU's are amazing for multicore gaming.

My only complaint is Windows 8.1 but you probably wouldn't use it...I'm glad Windows 7 Pro comes with DLNA support. It's funny Windows 7 and PS3 work nicely, and Windows 8.1 and PS4 have de-evolved in this regard.

 

https://communities.intel.com/thread/46003

4. Re: DLNA Streaming gone? Windows 8.1

 joe_intel

Community Member

joe_intel Nov 19, 2013 4:35 PM (in response to Drywall1373)

I have just confirmed that the DLNA streaming feature is not supported in Windows 8.1.

I am sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.

But I don't gain anything from having Win 7 over Win 8.1 do I? I just bought what seemed like the default option (my last OS was Win XP). So far I'm ignoring the Metro interface although it actually is pretty slick.


No not for you unless you like being able to stream any video file on your PC to say a PS3 or Sony Blu Ray player wirelessly and simply. I love that option, saves me from burning discs.



bonzobanana said:

At the other end of the scale I built my PC back in October I think last year for £230 (already had a 1TB HDD).

AMD A10 5800k
Radeon HD6670 2GB
Motherboard I forget the name of
8GB memory (2x4GB)
cheap case with psu
2 xDVDRW drives

Absolute cheap ass system but works well in dual graphics mode and plays all games well (not always at full detail). Quad core 4ghz processors seem fast enough for me.

Runs 3D games well on my passive 3D tv.

Skyrim screenshot below. 1080p and fast frame rate. Just making the point PC gaming doesn't have to be expensive. My PC costs less than a xbone and ps4 but delivers superior cpu performance and graphics performance between the two consoles. Also more memory and a faster hard drive. I've not been disappointed with the performance of any game although have had to adjust down some detail on later games. I can also do the xbone thing of rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling if necessary. Haven't needed to do this yet though.

A full AMD system, yes!!

The optimal low cost solution is cool too. Did you build it by yourself or it was pre-built? For how long do you plan to keep it until you upgrade to something that will be able to handle upcoming "true" next gen games?



FinalFantasyXIII said:
Slimebeast said:
FinalFantasyXIII said:

Great build! AMD CPU's are amazing for multicore gaming.

My only complaint is Windows 8.1 but you probably wouldn't use it...I'm glad Windows 7 Pro comes with DLNA support. It's funny Windows 7 and PS3 work nicely, and Windows 8.1 and PS4 have de-evolved in this regard.

 

https://communities.intel.com/thread/46003

4. Re: DLNA Streaming gone? Windows 8.1

 joe_intel

Community Member

joe_intel Nov 19, 2013 4:35 PM (in response to Drywall1373)

I have just confirmed that the DLNA streaming feature is not supported in Windows 8.1.

I am sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.

But I don't gain anything from having Win 7 over Win 8.1 do I? I just bought what seemed like the default option (my last OS was Win XP). So far I'm ignoring the Metro interface although it actually is pretty slick.


No not for you unless you like being able to stream any video file on your PC to say a PS3 or Sony Blu Ray player wirelessly and simply. I love that option, saves me from burning discs.


To be honest you could do that with Windows XP via TVersity, heck you could do it with Windows 2000.
In-fact I used to do that with the origional Xbox.

However, for HD content it requires a significant amount of processing time to pull off, not much of an issue for a decent PC.
I often Transcode on the fly to my Xbox 360, Playstation 3 (In fact, it's mostly used for that task and Blu-rays), phones, tablets, HTPC etc, sometimes all at the same time, having 12 threads on my CPU greatly helps in that regard though.

Windows 7 is probably the more preffered OS for allot of users, although Windows 8.1 is fantastic in terms of boot times and responsiveness, especially if you only have a mechanical drive, does require some re-learning however.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

crissindahouse said:
Slimebeast said:
crissindahouse said:
Gratz! Have fun and don't play too much Legends of Grimrock ;)

What do u mean, have u seen me play it on Steam?



Yeah found it pretty cool because I've played it a lot as well.

Cool. Have you completed it? I enjoyed it although I wouldn't say it's a masterpiece. The ending was a bif of a disappointment after all that work.

I'm gonna play lots more indie games like that thanks to Steam.



Around the Network
Slimebeast said:

A full AMD system, yes!!

The optimal low cost solution is cool too. Did you build it by yourself or it was pre-built? For how long do you plan to keep it until you upgrade to something that will be able to handle upcoming "true" next gen games?


I built it myself. If the xbox one is next gen so is my PC, considering I have a huge advantage in cpu performance, slightly more gpu power and more memory too.

Dare I suggest I think this will probably last me 3 years. I have two PC's and currently my other PC is the second PC (dual core intel PC ) so that one will get upgraded next and this AMD pc will become the second PC.

Obviously if a game comes along that specifically needs 8 cpu cores and more graphics memory that I desperately want to play on PC then I may be pushed to upgrade. I doubt 8 cpu cores will be the minimum spec for sometime though and my quadcore 4ghz cpu will manage.

Currently out of about 150 games I own on steam, 100% play perfectly with perhaps 10% needing to drop max detail level for 2D gaming and perhaps 20% for 3D gaming. I have about 5 on origin and 2 or 3 on uplay that have similar performance statistics.

Everytime I play Skyrim I'm amazed at how beautiful it looks on such a humble PC and I'm running a lot of mods too that slow the game down. To be honest I'd be happy to take it down to 720p if I had to although currently 1080p. The viewing distance to my 42" screen means I use a 720p mode for web browsing etc and I can't really tell the difference between 720p and 1080p gaming anyway. That said I may re-arrange my living room so I'm closer to the screen at some point.



bonzobanana said:
Slimebeast said:
 

A full AMD system, yes!!

The optimal low cost solution is cool too. Did you build it by yourself or it was pre-built? For how long do you plan to keep it until you upgrade to something that will be able to handle upcoming "true" next gen games?


I built it myself. If the xbox one is next gen so is my PC, considering I have a huge advantage in cpu performance, slightly more gpu power and more memory too.

Dare I suggest I think this will probably last me 3 years. I have two PC's and currently my other PC is the second PC (dual core intel PC ) so that one will get upgraded next and this AMD pc will become the second PC.

Obviously if a game comes along that specifically needs 8 cpu cores and more graphics memory that I desperately want to play on PC then I may be pushed to upgrade. I doubt 8 cpu cores will be the minimum spec for sometime though and my quadcore 4ghz cpu will manage.

Currently out of about 150 games I own on steam, 100% play perfectly with perhaps 10% needing to drop max detail level for 2D gaming and perhaps 20% for 3D gaming. I have about 5 on origin and 2 or 3 on uplay that have similar performance statistics.

Everytime I play Skyrim I'm amazed at how beautiful it looks on such a humble PC and I'm running a lot of mods too that slow the game down. To be honest I'd be happy to take it down to 720p if I had to although currently 1080p. The viewing distance to my 42" screen means I use a 720p mode for web browsing etc and I can't really tell the difference between 720p and 1080p gaming anyway. That said I may re-arrange my living room so I'm closer to the screen at some point.

Yeah, it will take eons before we see 8 cores as minimum specs.

But 3 years is a bit optimistic. Although it totally depends on what demands on quality you have. To be honest I am still fine with gaming on my old Radeon 4850, which will end up on my secondary comp.



Slimebeast said:

Yeah, it will take eons before we see 8 cores as minimum specs.

But 3 years is a bit optimistic. Although it totally depends on what demands on quality you have. To be honest I am still fine with gaming on my old Radeon 4850, which will end up on my secondary comp.


Yes I'm not sure at what level my PC will be performing in 3 years. I will probably be forced to 720p and upscaling with detail settings low on the latest games but it probably will manage ok I bet.

I think my older pc lasted  5 years with a graphics card update half way through its life. It still runs the majority of games. Games like Skyrim are acceptable on it.

For the next few years I'm more interested in getting a ps4 and perhaps a xbone.