By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Selnor1983 Titanfall Review

Slade6alpha said:
EB1994 said:
Slade6alpha said:
Remember guys, it's still his opinion and he's entitled to it.

So we can't disagree with his opinion? =P

I didn't say that, but I'm beginning to see more people attack the poster instead of the argument (or actual review). See the above posted...

Edit: Not directed at Think Man!

Heh I'm only kidding. Thought the "=P" would give it away.



Around the Network

If this game was on PS4 your review score would be taken a lot more seriously.



"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"

EB1994 said:

Heh I'm only kidding. Thought the "=P" would give it away.

See I should have picked up on that. My internet sarcasm reading has been off lately. xD



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

Quick ?

How are scores meaningless if based on fun? Or enjoyment?

I have read reviews where media give scores to games yet say they enjoyed the lower scoring game more. Yet scored it lower because it had more bugs etc. But yet even with those bugs they liked it more.

Surely fun and enjoyment is the only factor that matters to all readers as that is what keeps them playing and smiling?



selnor1983 said:
Quick ?

How are scores meaningless if based on fun? Or enjoyment?

I have read reviews where media give scores to games yet say they enjoyed the lower scoring game more. Yet scored it lower because it had more bugs etc. But yet even with those bugs they liked it more.

Surely fun and enjoyment is the only factor that matters to all readers as that is what keeps them playing and smiling?

Is this a statement of opinion or a question you are asking us?



Around the Network
selnor1983 said:
Quick ?

How are scores meaningless if based on fun? Or enjoyment?

I have read reviews where media give scores to games yet say they enjoyed the lower scoring game more. Yet scored it lower because it had more bugs etc. But yet even with those bugs they liked it more.

Surely fun and enjoyment is the only factor that matters to all readers as that is what keeps them playing and smiling?

A numbered score should be calculated from a combination of gameplay, graphics, story, sound, multiplayer etc. If you're ignoring all that and just assigning an arbitrary number based purely on fun then the whole score becomes meaningless. I agree with Jaywood, drop the numbers at the end and just give a thumbs up or thumbs down. 



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Both.



Oh boy... NOW I really want to see a Jallard review of titanfall.



Luck said:
Lyrikalstylez said:
Now I haven't played the game but I'd think the none single player campaign should automatically negative from the overall score

Why ? What about a game with single player only, should it get automatically penalized ?


We'll in my opinion it's an incomplete game and if I was reviewing it no matter how fun it was I would negate the score a little



random15 said:
Oh boy... NOW I really want to see a Jallard review of titanfall.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=180371&page=1



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!