haha nice thread! but it's really crazy what we risk sometimes just for a fast fuck.
haha nice thread! but it's really crazy what we risk sometimes just for a fast fuck.
Adinnieken said:
The reason why men are men is because of evolution. The shape of the human penis is designed as such as to extract sperm out of the vagina. Subsequently, to ensure fertilization of the ovum, men only have a single orgasm and become flacid. In addition, unlike women, the male orgasm is tied to a specific event, ejactulation. If men were to have multiple orgasms, then they would have difficulty with copulating with multiple partners and ensuring the continuation of the species. |
Close, but you're off on a few things.
It's not that men would have had multiple orgasms if not for copulating with different partners.
Women have multiple orgasms because it allows for as much insemination as possible (having multiple male partners).
Men also get lost in the moment, and are very affected by dopamine while copulating. The single orgasm breaks this effect by spiking it, which brings the male back into reality immediately after orgasm.
Males become flaccid to allow for other males to have their "turn".


spurgeonryan said:
buy the way, the new show Ice cold gold, filmed in Greenland where the ice has finally melted after 10,000 years, is really good. |
well if you only got 3 seconds of pleasure you are doing something wrong, really wrong
theprof00 said:
Close, but you're off on a few things. Men also get lost in the moment, and are very affected by dopamine while copulating. The single orgasm breaks this effect by spiking it, which brings the male back into reality immediately after orgasm. Males become flaccid to allow for other males to have their "turn". |
If the case was to allow for other males to have their "turn" then that could potentially defeat the purpose of copulating in the first place. Because once another male entered the vagina, the head of the penis would essentially extract any seminal fluid or deteriorate it through excessive friction. Not only that but with one sexual partner the vagina can easily develop tears, making sex painful. Multiple partners would be even worse.
Plus your view point doesn't fit with the typical desire for women to have a single partner, where as men are more capable of having multiple partners. That isn't to suggest you can't have indivuals that fit outside those norms, but I would need some evidence to convince me differently from my opinion.
Adinnieken said:
If the case was to allow for other males to have their "turn" then that could potentially defeat the purpose of copulating in the first place. Because once another male entered the vagina, the head of the penis would essentially extract any seminal fluid or deteriorate it through excessive friction. Not only that but with one sexual partner the vagina can easily develop tears, making sex painful. Multiple partners would be even worse. |
That is not true in the slightest.
And again, multiple orgasms allows to woman to stay lubricated.
Not all women do not desire to have a single partner either, I don't know where you came up with that. There are a large number of women who choose multiple partners. These women tend to procreate the most, and the earliest (factoring in age rates of early man as well).
Also, I'm not going to work at convincing you out of your opinion. Feel free to have it, what do I care that you're wrong?

