By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Monarchy, are they really born to rule and why we need them?

RoryGamesFree on 27 December 2012
Soleron said:
Our Queen fulfills all the roles of a President as head of state with the same costs, but also creates tourism and promotes the UK brand worldwide. There's no good economic argument for replacement, and as long as she has no power and doesn't speak out on day-to-day politics I'm OK with it.


the tourism argument is horseshit, as if people only come here because of her, you don't meet the old bag by coming to London ffs. 

got nout to do with economics, it's to do with democracy and elitism, but if you find inequality in society okay then enjoy being a subject and essentially endorsing slavery by all means.



Around the Network
Soleron on 27 December 2012
RoryGamesFree said:
Soleron said:
....

got nout to do with economics, it's to do with democracy and elitism, but if you find inequality in society okay then enjoy being a subject and essentially endorsing slavery by all means.

lol



Lostplanet22 on 27 December 2012
RoryGamesFree said:
Soleron said:
Our Queen fulfills all the roles of a President as head of state with the same costs, but also creates tourism and promotes the UK brand worldwide. There's no good economic argument for replacement, and as long as she has no power and doesn't speak out on day-to-day politics I'm OK with it.


the tourism argument is horseshit, as if people only come here because of her, you don't meet the old bag by coming to London ffs. 

got nout to do with economics, it's to do with democracy and elitism, but if you find inequality in society okay then enjoy being a subject and essentially endorsing slavery by all means.

How many tourists came for the marriage this year?  100.000?     How many people watched the marriage live?  50? 80 million?  Yeah their quite some people interested in monarchy...



 

Pyro as Bill on 27 December 2012
RoryGamesFree said:
Soleron said:
Our Queen fulfills all the roles of a President as head of state with the same costs, but also creates tourism and promotes the UK brand worldwide. There's no good economic argument for replacement, and as long as she has no power and doesn't speak out on day-to-day politics I'm OK with it.


the tourism argument is horseshit, as if people only come here because of her, you don't meet the old bag by coming to London ffs. 

got nout to do with economics, it's to do with democracy and elitism, but if you find inequality in society okay then enjoy being a subject and essentially endorsing slavery by all means.


If your democracy is so precious to you, you'll have nothing to complain about when we overwhelmingly vote to keep the monarchy and execute any traitors/republicans.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

RoryGamesFree on 27 December 2012
Lostplanet22 said:
RoryGamesFree said:
Soleron said:
Our Queen fulfills all the roles of a President as head of state with the same costs, but also creates tourism and promotes the UK brand worldwide. There's no good economic argument for replacement, and as long as she has no power and doesn't speak out on day-to-day politics I'm OK with it.


the tourism argument is horseshit, as if people only come here because of her, you don't meet the old bag by coming to London ffs. 

got nout to do with economics, it's to do with democracy and elitism, but if you find inequality in society okay then enjoy being a subject and essentially endorsing slavery by all means.

How many tourists came for the marriage this year?  100.000?     How many people watched the marriage live?  50? 80 million?  Yeah their quite some people interested in monarchy...


I doubt it was anything like that much, heck the extra bank holiday actually cost the economy more...they are only their for pompous twonks like you who hate freedom and democracy and want to live in an aristocracy.



Around the Network
RoryGamesFree on 27 December 2012
Pyro as Bill said:
RoryGamesFree said:
Soleron said:
Our Queen fulfills all the roles of a President as head of state with the same costs, but also creates tourism and promotes the UK brand worldwide. There's no good economic argument for replacement, and as long as she has no power and doesn't speak out on day-to-day politics I'm OK with it.


the tourism argument is horseshit, as if people only come here because of her, you don't meet the old bag by coming to London ffs. 

got nout to do with economics, it's to do with democracy and elitism, but if you find inequality in society okay then enjoy being a subject and essentially endorsing slavery by all means.


If your democracy is so precious to you, you'll have nothing to complain about when we overwhelmingly vote to keep the monarchy and execute any traitors/republicans.

only people need exectuing are idiots like you for stupidity, you know fuck all about anything clearly. want to live in a cuntocracy then fuck off to North Korea and such on Kim's dick like her majestey's tits.

 

>User was moderated for this post [RH]



Soleron on 27 December 2012
RoryGamesFree said:
...

only people need exectuing are idiots like you for stupidity, you know fuck all about anything clearly. want to live in a cuntocracy then fuck off to North Korea and such on Kim's dick like her majestey's tits.

Quality post right here. If you're anti-monarchy can you not put together an argument that isn't ad hominem and is at least based on reality (that the UK monarchy is constitutional)



Nem on 27 December 2012

Monarchy and dictatorships have no place in governing. The representatives have to be elected by the people and be qualified for the job (just like every other job).

Monarchy is only around because its fodder for pink publications.