By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - I'm not buying this 3D thing

Albion on 03 April 2011
amp316 said:
Albion said:

So Nintendo may have a chance at wining over 3rd party publishers and your saying..

I wont support you Nintendo for trying to gain 3rd party support?

No.  I'm saying that I'm not going to run out and buy a 3DS to kiss the butt of the 3rd parties that have treated me, a Nintendo only home console owner, as a 3rd rate customer.  If they support the next home console, I'll be on board.

I also explained why the 3DS isn't for me.  I'm not going to shell out my hard earned money for a bunch of really old games that have 3D slapped on them.  If this is great 3rd party support, then I don't want it.  I am confused as to what good 3rd party support is though, because as I have been told, I don't even know what a good 3rd party game is. 

Then you "can" , buy the 3DS. 

But only to reward Good first party  software. 

Or to support 3rd party publishers that did support the Wii with some

high quality games.   

=)



Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight on 03 April 2011
Albion said:
amp316 said:
Albion said:

So Nintendo may have a chance at wining over 3rd party publishers and your saying..

I wont support you Nintendo for trying to gain 3rd party support?

No.  I'm saying that I'm not going to run out and buy a 3DS to kiss the butt of the 3rd parties that have treated me, a Nintendo only home console owner, as a 3rd rate customer.  If they support the next home console, I'll be on board.

I also explained why the 3DS isn't for me.  I'm not going to shell out my hard earned money for a bunch of really old games that have 3D slapped on them.  If this is great 3rd party support, then I don't want it.  I am confused as to what good 3rd party support is though, because as I have been told, I don't even know what a good 3rd party game is. 

Then you "can" , buy the 3DS. 

But only to reward Good first party  software. 

Or to support 3rd party publishers that did support the Wii with some

high quality games.   

=)


Me, that would be Activision, Sega, and even Ubisoft.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Albion on 03 April 2011

Capcom?

 



LordTheNightKnight on 03 April 2011
Albion said:

Capcom?

 


RE4 sells a million copies, they even say it's a test to see the Wii audience, and they don't follow it up. They say SF IV would be on there if the fans wanted it, and sales of TvC didn't convince them. Then the 3DS makes them all over it, even though not a single proof of an audience is there.

They just care about the tech, not the customers, so screw them.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Albion on 03 April 2011

Still Im happy they brought MHt to the Wii . 



Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight on 03 April 2011
Albion said:

Still Im happy they brought MHt to the Wii . 


Yeah, they did make games, but it seemed somewhere between 2008 and 2009, any major game they weren't already making was being dropped (and MHT was one of those).



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Albion on 03 April 2011
LordTheNightKnight said:
Albion said:

Still Im happy they brought MHt to the Wii . 


Yeah, they did make games, but it seemed somewhere between 2008 and 2009, any major game they weren't already making was being dropped (and MHT was one of those).



So They turned on Nintendo arround the same time Motion controllers where announced for the HD twins?

What did you expect?

You can't deny that was a huge blow to the Wii.   Its what made it "the" Wii. 

Since then the 3rd part publisher's have continued moving to the HD twins you say.

That's cause Software company's can now publish  HD graphics with Motion controls on PS360.

High polygone count isent everything, Like a  hot body is totaly not a total turn on.

Sure, Withought a  great personality Games arn't  that entertaining. 

But you still have 90% of the male population that will not touch a fat chick with a ten foot pole.

You can't blame Publishers for moving on to the "Winner".

 

 

 

 



salaminizer on 03 April 2011
Hephaestos said:
salaminizer said:

I don't give a crap about 3D. I'm fine with it in movies because I know they're not working in the 3D side instead of "optimizing" it, like PC games. I couldn't care less if a game supports NVIDIA 3D Vision when it's fucking buggy and filled with blurry textures. with the 3DS it's a different story, but it's not something that attracts me too.


errr do you even own 3DVision? you know there's a knob on the emiter to increase/decrease the 3D... and too high a setting isn't viewable.

what? no, I don't. what I'm saying is that devs/publishers boasts about how their game supports 3D instead of improving textures from console counterparts and bugs. or they delay a port and wants to "compensate" by "supporting 3D"



the words above were backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS!

Albion on 03 April 2011
RolStoppable said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Albion said:

Capcom?

RE4 sells a million copies, they even say it's a test to see the Wii audience, and they don't follow it up. They say SF IV would be on there if the fans wanted it, and sales of TvC didn't convince them. Then the 3DS makes them all over it, even though not a single proof of an audience is there.

They just care about the tech, not the customers, so screw them.

All third parties are guilty of this when it comes to the Wii. Despite some disgusting decisions, Capcom still has released some good games for the Wii. There isn't a single major third party publisher that has treated the Wii fairly, so boycotting one third party more than another isn't really justified.

Well, there's EA, but in order to boycott them they would have to make some good 3DS games first. That's not going to happen.

Game publishers that boycotted the Wii from launch and never looked back should be your main targuets



LordTheNightKnight on 03 April 2011
Albion said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Albion said:

Still Im happy they brought MHt to the Wii . 


Yeah, they did make games, but it seemed somewhere between 2008 and 2009, any major game they weren't already making was being dropped (and MHT was one of those).



So They turned on Nintendo arround the same time Motion controllers where announced for the HD twins?

What did you expect?

You can't deny that was a huge blow to the Wii.   Its what made it "the" Wii. 

Since then the 3rd part publisher's have continued moving to the HD twins you say.

That's cause Software company's can now publish  HD graphics with Motion controls on PS360.

High polygone count isent everything, Like a  hot body is totaly not a total turn on.

Sure, Withought a  great personality Games arn't  that entertaining. 

But you still have 90% of the male population that will not touch a fat chick with a ten foot pole.

You can't blame Publishers for moving on to the "Winner".

 

 

 

 


No, I meant before even that. And why should the Wii have been unique to have reason to support it? It's sales that show they should have supported the system.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs