By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - GT5 graphics aren't that impressive

enrageorange said:

i see the only owners of the game that praise it should be listened to. Those who are dissapointed are obviously lieing that they have it. Please explain how GT5 kills forza from a racing perspective. As in explain in detail your experiences with both games. Funny how a few days isn't enough playtime for reviewers to make negative judgements but is more then enough for owners to make positive ones.


Because the people that play a game for a while and like it haven't experienced that bad parts of a game. Just sayin.



Around the Network

yeah yeah yeah, to all people here mentioning Forza 3 in the same sentence as GT5.

 

FORZA 3 IS WAY WAYYYYY WORSE THAN GT5. Read this and stop your dillusions once and for all :

 

http://classygamer.blogspot.com/2010/02/forza-motorsport-3-what-went-wrong.html#comments

 

Not a single TRUE Forza gamer could argue against this guy. NOT ONE. Forza 3 is deeply flawed, and reviewers like IGN pocketed their good M$ Money and looked the other way. Even worse, IGN lied in their Forza 3 review talking all high about all the "online features" .

 

So please, stfu about Forza 3 in this thread, thank you.



Kowenicki is right. Some parts of the game just look outstanding (London, Tokyo) but then again, there are quite a few parts where the game looks pretty bad, dare I say worser than Forza. Some tracks are a bit bland and but some are really good. However, car models look preety damn awesome but I haven't tries any non-premium cars so I'm hoping they don't disappoint in that aspect.

Fortunately, the physics are great, same with the races and licences aswell as the new features. The second-hand dealership makes a comback which is sweet as is photo mode. Kart racing is also surprisingly fun.

Those are about the only things I've tried though; while the graphics ARE disappointing, the rest is great. I've played the game for about 5 hours so I know what I'm talking about.

Btw, the trees...don't even go there.




sabby_e17 said:

Kowenicki is right. Some parts of the game just look outstanding (London, Tokyo) but then again, there are quite a few parts where the game looks pretty bad, dare I say worser than Forza. Some tracks are a bit bland and but some are really good. However, car models look preety damn awesome but I haven't tries any non-premium cars so I'm hoping they don't disappoint in that aspect.

Fortunately, the physics are great, same with the races and licences aswell as the new features. The second-hand dealership makes a comback which is sweet as is photo mode. Kart racing is also surprisingly fun.

Those are about the only things I've tried though; while the graphics ARE disappointing, the rest is great. I've played the game for about 5 hours so I know what I'm talking about.

Btw, the trees...don't even go there.


Do the graphics look worse than GT5 Prologue at times?



sieanr said:
deskpro2k3 said:

I have no idea what is wrong with some of you. You either need a better TV or actually play the game or something.. Its ridiculous reading some comments posted in here. when facts hits you in the face you still deny it.


Facts? Like direct captures from the game itself.

I think it was someone here who said that the levels look like they were worked on by different teams. I think thats true, or some of the older courses were just straight ports from the PS2 GTs.

 

Thats gotta be a stretched image from a standard definition screen capture. That image looks NOTHING like what I've been seeing at 1080P. Sorry, but I'm just not buying it. Any hater can take a screen capture at 480P and stretch it up to 720P or 1080P where it degrades quality even further and pass it off as a direct HD screen capture.

 

Road textures and grass textures aren't 100% perfect, but they sure don't look like THAT. Thats GT2-esque, and you won't be seeing any of that in GT5.

 

On my 55" Sony LED-LCD 240hz /w custom music running, I HONESTLY couldn't ask for a better racing experience... and thats coming from someone who extensively enjoyed Forza 3 while I was waiting for this game.



Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
jhuff394 said:

To everyone who has commented....

I am assuming you are all on a high quality 1080P hd tv... made by Sony, Samsung, LG, Phillips, or Sharp...

Otherwise.. don't bother commenting...

I saw this on a Sony Bravia 52" 1080P 240HZ display.. and couldn't tell it apart from real life.

I'll be on a 32" 1080p Samsung LCD 60hz (2009)

I saw it on a 42" 1080 200Hz - I think it was 200hz -  LG and it was pretty damn good.

The truth is not many X360 lovers (not saying the OP is) is gonna say it's better than Forza..... It's a fact of life.

Some members are so predictable you already knew what they were gonna say about GT5 (or any PS3 game) long before release.

 



sieanr said:
deskpro2k3 said:

I have no idea what is wrong with some of you. You either need a better TV or actually play the game or something.. Its ridiculous reading some comments posted in here. when facts hits you in the face you still deny it.


Facts? Like direct captures from the game itself.

I think it was someone here who said that the levels look like they were worked on by different teams. I think thats true, or some of the older courses were just straight ports from the PS2 GTs.


That would indded explain the game's uneven graphics. Does any one have a link about this ?



geddesmond2 said:

Despite popular belief I am a Sony supporter but I'm not a fanboy. The visuals in the game are a letdown on certain areas. On some parts you look at it and say wow but on others it looks like a PS2 game. Now I know why they only had the Night level with rain on display at the PS hub because that is breathtaking.

Still reguardless of what I said the game still is the best looking game I've played this year with Castlevania giving it some very strong competition. I know this message will get some hate but I'm only stating the truth. Other than that the games fun but the constant installs even after the 8GB install that took an hour to complete gets annoying as hell. Honestly if I was a reviewer I too would mark the game down because of the installs alone. Its no wonder the games not getting great reviews

A PS2 game? Really?



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

gekkokamen said:
sabby_e17 said:

Kowenicki is right. Some parts of the game just look outstanding (London, Tokyo) but then again, there are quite a few parts where the game looks pretty bad, dare I say worser than Forza. Some tracks are a bit bland and but some are really good. However, car models look preety damn awesome but I haven't tries any non-premium cars so I'm hoping they don't disappoint in that aspect.

Fortunately, the physics are great, same with the races and licences aswell as the new features. The second-hand dealership makes a comback which is sweet as is photo mode. Kart racing is also surprisingly fun.

Those are about the only things I've tried though; while the graphics ARE disappointing, the rest is great. I've played the game for about 5 hours so I know what I'm talking about.

Btw, the trees...don't even go there.


Do the graphics look worse than GT5 Prologue at times?


Yes, at certain points (but only few and far between)

The game is still awesome, and imo the best simulator this gen by some distance. Will definitely go down in my top 5 favourite games this gen. 




HexenLord said:
sieanr said:
deskpro2k3 said:

I have no idea what is wrong with some of you. You either need a better TV or actually play the game or something.. Its ridiculous reading some comments posted in here. when facts hits you in the face you still deny it.


Facts? Like direct captures from the game itself.

I think it was someone here who said that the levels look like they were worked on by different teams. I think thats true, or some of the older courses were just straight ports from the PS2 GTs.

 

Thats gotta be a stretched image from a standard definition screen capture. That image looks NOTHING like what I've been seeing at 1080P. Sorry, but I'm just not buying it. Any hater can take a screen capture at 480P and stretch it up to 720P or 1080P where it degrades quality even further and pass it off as a direct HD screen capture.

 

Road textures and grass textures aren't 100% perfect, but they sure don't look like THAT. Thats GT2-esque, and you won't be seeing any of that in GT5.

 

On my 55" Sony LED-LCD 240hz /w custom music running, I HONESTLY couldn't ask for a better racing experience... and thats coming from someone who extensively enjoyed Forza 3 while I was waiting for this game.


Its from jeuxvideo, which is pretty much the french IGN. They are using direct captures from the 1080p mode. But feel free to argue that they're somehow tampering with the image. Maybe you should race on deep forest first.

Link to gallery/review

http://www.jeuxvideo.com/articles/0001/00013884-gran-turismo-5-test.htm



Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away"