The_Liquid_Laser said:
E3 has that kind of attendence, because the event is intentionally made exclusive. Again, this is a lot like saying the Oscars are not a major event, because it is mostly just Hollywood types attending. Meanwhile, about 30m people watch the Oscars live and countless more watch highlights, red carpet footage and other similar stuff. It is the biggest event of the year for the movie industry, because of all the eyeballs drawn in. The actual attendance doesn't matter as much. E3 - 1300k Clearly E3 is the biggest gaming event, worldwide, by a huge margin. |
You know that validates the excuse for Sony not going right?
If they dropping the Logo on CES (non-gaming event) get twice as much hype than MS revealing the console at a gaming related event.
So whatever they do will still get coverage, but yes do some joke on it.
Besides, congrats on "prove my point with a quick google search, that is all the evidence you need".
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."