fordy said:
I'm surprised that you deleted the comment that I responded to, which was treating SSD "like Optane"... Opatane is NOT NAND; It's 3D Xpoint. Not only is Optane faster, when used as a HDD cache, it contains vastly different caching methods compared to SSHDs to make use of the magnitudes greater TBW compared to NAND. That is why Optane can achieve speeds much greater than SSHDs. Caching via SSD is NOT done "like Optane". Please do your research before arguing your point. |
I didn't delete anything. Perhaps you don't pay attention, but VGC autodelets trees due to people in the past forgetting to trim their quote trees.
None of what you replied to was written by me.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."