By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
coolbeans said:
Machiavellian said:

That should clear up an ambiguity with the redacted report.  I highly doubt that Mueller will not give his honest account of the report and his conclusions and determinations.  Either way, it should clear up some stuff so we can all move one one way or the other.  The thing is, if Barr is actually covering up for the President, we probably will get to the truth.  I believe that's pretty much want any American would want.  No more BS on both sides lets just get the facts straight.

So, I'm not really sure just what kind of Hail Mary people are expecting at this point.  Emphasizing that this is a "redacted report" shouldn't really hold any water on its own, as virtually all reports of this magnitude do.  And, as someone who's begun reading it, there's a healthy amount of text to chew through.  The most heavily redacted part I've seen skimming through makes sense: investigating Russian hacking & dumping operations (i.e. investigations that are still ongoing).  Literally the central point of this investigation states early on that "...the investigation did not establish that members of The Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with The Russian government in its election interference activities."  

Even though the report established that there was no collusion there is still a lot of info that shows that people like Trump jr and Manafort were involved with wikileaks/russia in some form. Also there is a case to be made about obstruction of justice.