coolbeans said:
So, I'm not really sure just what kind of Hail Mary people are expecting at this point. Emphasizing that this is a "redacted report" shouldn't really hold any water on its own, as virtually all reports of this magnitude do. And, as someone who's begun reading it, there's a healthy amount of text to chew through. The most heavily redacted part I've seen skimming through makes sense: investigating Russian hacking & dumping operations (i.e. investigations that are still ongoing). Literally the central point of this investigation states early on that "...the investigation did not establish that members of The Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with The Russian government in its election interference activities."  |
Even though the report established that there was no collusion there is still a lot of info that shows that people like Trump jr and Manafort were involved with wikileaks/russia in some form. Also there is a case to be made about obstruction of justice.