The_Liquid_Laser said:
You will never please anyone. Instead they should be asking what is smart. PS4 was smart, even if people complain, they did the right thing. Obviously we can tell it has been doing well. PS3 was not smart. They lost a ton of money with that. They are better off having people moan about playing it safe. I mean, is playing it safe a terrible strategy? "Sure Sony, you could go for guaranteed profits, but why not do something really risky instead?" Playing it safe is not really such a bad criticism for a piece of hardware. |
What it might look like from afar... very far away...
With BC and games mostly likely be enhanced, right from the start PS5 will have an array of high quality titles, that were praised to high heaven almost throughout the entire generation, including yet to be released heavy weights. While the main competition guy was scolded continuously throughout the entire generation, with a powerful hardware already released, but no system sellers in sight. It is what it is.
There will be enough buyers when the PS5 launches. Even if the price tag is 600. I have no doubt about it. Taking in consideration how the PS3 did fare. And that even Sony was surprised how well PS4 was selling, struggling to keep up with demand, with hardware shortages well over half a year after launch.
To shoot for a higher price in order to spread demand and not to be outperformed in power for an extensive period of time is strategically sound. Always keep Virtual Reality in mind. Undoubtely Sony insinsts on pulling through. As we all know VR is very demanding. When a PSVR2 arrives a base of potent hardware has to pre exist. There is no way around it if Sony wants to surge ahead to be ahead of (potential) competitors.
Hunting Season is done...