By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
twintail said:

Buying mutiplatform studios with no direct connection to MS was less than a year ago. I suppose you could always add PUBG, that is not exactly that long ago either.

And Hellblade Switch is not published by them cause they had zero say on the matter.

It is not really about what Nintendo or Sony have done lately but rather that MS is not 'not doing it'.

What does buying studio's got to do with buying timed exclusives? Completey different topic. You can argue that with every platform maker.

It doesn't matter who publishes Hellblade, MS own Ninja Theory who will be earning money off the sales which MS now make a % of there profit. Yes thats correct, MS will be making money off Hellblade weather you like it or not. To say MS have no control on the decision is facepalm worthy. They own the studio who owns the IP. Are you going to argue that its not MSs decision to bring Halo to Steam next? come on haha. Especially when MS came out recently suggesting bringing GamePass and published titles to Switch.

So you are trying to avoid the question? Nice try, what has Nintendo or Sony brought to other platform's? MS see past the anti consumer business. Its why i praise them this gen. I dont need to buy an Xbox, but not because out of some childish spite, but because of convience.

I suggest you boycott these games if you dont like MS. Same goes with Cuphead etc. 

Read this before you post a reply so you can see exactly how wrong you are when it comes to MS and there control of there games.

http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2019/03/microsoft_asked_the_studio_behind_cuphead_to_bring_the_game_to_switch

Last edited by Azzanation - on 15 April 2019