By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dharh said:
Immersiveunreality said:

Yeah every different kind of practice has gone wrong in history so that is not really a solid argument and also new countries that still exist to today were made that way throughout history,so yes thing can always go wrong and there are many different kind of ways to go about it but hey it might have been worth the shot right considering it would rarely result into more casualties than WWII had?

Sectarian violence, forever.  Also, the example of WWII is generally held as the reason we have not had a world war since.  Prevent that WW only find that we had a different WW.  I'll take the history we know over a history we don't.

First bolded: The violence already happened and that was WWI,Germany lost territory after the war without much violence

Second bolded:Thats why completely dissolving the country could have been one of the only chances of preventing it.

Third bolded:Yeah, but in your first post you were talking about changing the history so this kinda changes goalposts no?