Fallout 76 Sucks.

[pokoko]

Madword said:

pokoko said:

That makes absolutely no sense at all.  Fallout 4 had ten times the amount of stuff to explore and find than New Vegas.  More than that, actually, by a long shot.  I'd found and done everything New Vegas had to offer by level 50 but was nowhere close to finding everything in Fallout 4 by level 100.  Anyone complaining about "exploration" in Fallout 4 probably just played it like a linear game and went where the prompts told them and found a tiny fraction of the total content.  As for settlement stuff, all you had to do was not do it.  As simple as that.  Calling something "rubbish" that many, many other people love, and which is 99% optional, doesn't make much sense, either.  Leave that to the creative people, you can just ignore it if it's too hard for you.

May not make sense to you but it did to me.

Many people complained about the settlement stuff to be fair, so lets not just brush it under the carpet of I don't know what Im talking about. People didn't think 4 was as good as 3, I wasn't the only one in this thread and in the world that thought this.

Doesn't matter to me which one you liked the most, I'm talking about what you said making little sense.  How can it have gotten away from exploration when it had more to explore than the other two games combined?  Why is settlement building so bad when you don't even have to do it?  The people who don't like it can simply skip it.  Meanwhile, many people love settlement building and have done some incredible things with it.  It's not "rubbish" just because you didn't like a feature that you can mostly ignore in the first place.

I don't care if you didn't like it, I'm just responding to the things you said which made no sense.