the-pi-guy said:
No it isn't. For a judge especially, there's a major difference. What'd you have for lunch a year ago? Must not have happened, if you can't remember. For people of the law, it's an important distinction. Not remembering can mean it did or didn't happen and it's still on the table as a possibility. Saying it didn't happen, means it didn't happen. Saying "something didn't happen" refutes the event. Saying they have no memory of the event, does not.
Well that doesn't make any sense, but okay. Usually when you ask me if I've done "something like X", I think categorically, not specifically. If you ask me, have I been to K-Mart? I might say "no, but I've been to similar stores like Wal-mart" But you might answer, "no i've never been to a similar store, I only go to Wal-mart." Because you say that makes more sense to you.
You like to give him the benefit of the doubt and blame her. I don't want to give either of them the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even care about this anymore. All this democrats vs republican arguments disgusts me.
Yeah you can. People can be brave and do things they are afraid to do. I'm incredibly afraid of public speaking, and if you asked me, I'd almost rather die than speak in public. Yet I've managed to do so many times. |
I thought you didn’t want to give either the benefit of the doubt? Isn’t your last comment doing exactly that for Ford?