| VGPolyglot said: You say that it's a non sequitur right here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8771892 And again, you're talking about her having to take responsibility, once again trying to focus on what she should have done instead of just saying that the husband shouldn't have raped her. |
I have clearly explained to you time and again that my original post was an observation on the oddness of rape within marriage, just an observation. yes I said it strikes me as odd that one would marry a person only to tell that person one does not wish to have sex later on.
it's an OBSERVATION and nothing more and as such it is indeed a non sequitur.
But from there, people began saying that I condone rape within marriage, therefore I had to ADAPT to that SHIFT and explain my position on rape inside marriage which one could say is another issue from the original one.
If you start a post saying, how the weather is weird and all and some people start attacking and accusing you of, I don't know, trying to control the weather to destroy mankind or something, you will NATURALLY SHIFT your posts from "wow this weather we have is weird" to "I am not saying we should control the weather to destroy mankind"
Then a guy like you shows up and tries to hold against me that my original post was about how weird the weather is compared to my current posts about me not trying to control the weather to destroy mankind.
In other words I don't mind discussing my original point but, and I don't know if you noticed but I'm STILL BUSY explaining and defending my argument in this SHIFT that I did not cause. So what do you want? Discuss my original point? Discuss the shift? or perhaps you are trying to imply that the shift means what? that I have no point? that I'm a bad person?
I don't mind you asking me why my original point was what it was compared to what is currently discussed, but when I ALREADY answered that question both publicly and privately and you come up with this issue again, forgive me but I can't help but wonder about your motives. Are we in a mindset of debate or back in that mindset of two days ago of my being attacked and my words being misconstrued to make me say what I very clearly did not say?
EDIT: ASLO when time and again I very clearly say that rape inside marriage is a crime and the culprit is the rapist, I pretty much answer your last line... AGAIN.
