By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
McDonaldsGuy said:

Not acceptable.

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

The statement you quote says "a well regulated militia." Why is that part not important?

It's explaining the reason we need the amendment.

It is saying that the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, because a well regulated militia is necessary for a free state.

Let me give you a recent example: literally this week China has just declared that Xi can be the President of China for a lifetime. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/emperor-xi-china-gambles-on-return-to-lifetime-rule-9991724

China doesn't have the right to bear arms, so this is their defense against a rogue state:

(Jeff Widener, Associated Press)

The second amendment has NOTHING to do with self defense or hunting. It has EVERYTHING to do with defending ourselves from a possible rogue government.