By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo said:
potato_hamster said:

Man this is ridiculous. I've never denied any of the actual facts you posted above, but some of the things you posted above are actually your opinion. But that's par for the course for the likes of you - treating your opinion as facts and expecting others to. There are many ways to interpret the actual facts you posted above that actually do lead to Nintendo releasing a 3DS successor, but you refuse to accept that possibility, and then have the audacity to say that I am in denial? Don't kid yourself. Your interpretation of the facts is just that - your interpretation. It is in no way the only way to interpret them, despite what your arrogant authoritarian posturing suggests.

As for what RolStoppable wrote, again that's more hyperbolic bullshit. I never said that the Switch isnt the successor to the Wii U and 3DS. I've never once made that claim in spite many of you claim I have.  I simply laughed how many of you thought it was so fucking obvious that Nintendo was announcing a core pokemon game for the Switch in that Direct. Sorrynotsorry for rubbing your shit-eating arrogance in your faces, because it's obvious to anyione that the collective lot of you don't know nearly as much as you think you do when it comes to Nintendo, yet you continue to act like you know everything, and anyone who dares question you is an ignorant pleeb. The first actual legitimate evidence that there may not be a 3DS successor was the core pokemon announcement at E3, and even then, that might not turn out to be the game you think it is. Of course, once again, this is yet another example of arrogant exclamations that your interpretation of the fact is the only possible correct one. But let's not let reality get in the way of your fucking tunnel vision.

I mean what the fuck happens if Nintendo actually comes out and announces a 3DS successor? You, and the others on this site that act like such authorities on all things Nintendo what I wrote might as well commit seppuku in front of Nintendo's headquarters, because you and I both know there's no coming back from that. You might as well quit the site if that day comes.

Actually only thing that I wrote and that is my opinion and very strong point, is that "there is no reason at all to release another handheld platform or to continue with DS line alongside Switch", and that is based on clear facts I mentioned (Nintendo merged their home console hardware and handheld hardware divisions, and they merged their home console software and handheld software divisions, fact that Nintendo talked and admitted they can't any more support effectively two different platforms, fact that Switch is already handheld in same time). There is always posibilite for different handheld platform or to continue with DS line, but point is that is highly unlikely now when we have Switch (there is even possibility that Nintendo will abonded Switch next year, but that also highly unlikely), and instead we will almost certain have Switch Mini/Pocket, and thats what most people here are saying to you, while you from some reason keep pushing highly unlikely scenario.

Again, because apparently this still hasn't sunk into you, you are treating your interpretation of what these facts (and opinions) mean as if it's an objective fact, as if your interpretation is 99.9% correct, and it's not even remotely possible you might be wrong.

This is not true.

The fact that you say ""there is no reason at all to release another handheld platform or to continue with DS line alongside Switch" means that you are ignoring facts and information because that is objectively false. The fact that you seem to equate Nintendo releasing a 3DS successor with the likelihood of Nintendo abandoning the Switch altogether next year is as clear of an indicator you can get of just how arrogant and over-confident you're being.
 That's really all there is to it.