DonFerrari on 05 November 2014
| starcraft said: Seriously. Was this thread really necessary? Your console of choice still has a commanding lead. Why you would want one console to dominate another is beyond me, given how counterproductive that is for innovation on all consoles, including yours. But nonetheless, your console is on top of sales. So why on earth does it get to you so severely when another console receives a small sales bump, the complete magnitude of which will certainly be temporary? How is it that you allow that to chip away at you to such a degree that a thread like this is necessary? |
Was the original thread really necessary?
Because your console of choice is lagging so much agaisnt the leader then any small ray of sun must be exaggerated and celebrated generating a flame fest thread??? Have you noticed how this thread is well behaved?
Edit. BANNED FOR USING THE REPORT TOOL FOR HUMOUR - Starcraft
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
