Why does it matter if Wii U games dont look as good as others?

[SubiyaCryolite]

Zelhawks37 said:

SubiyaCryolite said:

Zelhawks37 said:
Because Sony and Microsoft fanboys want to feel "superior" to Nintendo ones in some shape or form, so graphics is the only clear cut thing that they have over Nintendo. Add the "dude bros" who like to play madden, COD, etc. as well. Kind of sad really.

A quick look at Metacritic shows that for all Wii releases, the number of games rated 80+ ends half way down the first page. On the 360 side, the page ends at 84 and goes on on the next page. PS3 ends at 87 on the 1st page and ends at 84 on the SECOND page. You guys must really live in alternate dimension or something. If you think better graphics is the only thing the PS3, 360, X1 or PS4 have/will offer over the Wii or Wii U you are simply living in denial.

Remember, I said "fanboys", not fans. Just like I am a Nintendo "fan", doesn't mean I buy just Nintendo, as you can see from the games I am currently playing. In a Sony fan's mindset, sure, there are plenty of games on the PS3 that are awesome and I agree, seeing as how I want one myself. Just saying graphics aren't everything as per the topic.

"Just saying graphics aren't everything as per the topic." I see, I have no problem with this. "so graphics is the only clear cut thing that they have over Nintendo" I have a problem with that notion. Certain Nintendo fans believe graphics alone are all that these systems have to offer which is clearly false, based on the sheer number of good quality games available on their predecessors in comparison to the Wii. The notion that emphasis on good graphics, indepth themes or storys, physics, scale or general technology somehow reduces a games gameplay, fun or quality is equally wrong.