Mummelmann said:
Zero999 said:
Mummelmann said:
Zero999 said:
I already explained why YOUR prediction is the outlandish one. enjoy the reading.
|
Uh, so "bolded: laughable" is your explanation? I wish you gave me something more to read though, I find your explanation somewhat lackluster, to be perfectly honest. That really says it all, doesn't it. You responded in the exact way I assumed, nothing to see here.
|
No, the whole 450% fallacy is the explanation.
|
My 450% fallacy is the explanation for my 450% fallacy. Ok. I think I'm gonna log off and do something else now, you're simply debating on a scale that is way beyond me and I need rest.
|
I think I wasn't clear. my EXPLANATION of your 450% "argument" is the explanation i mentioned.