Quantcast
View Post

It's obvious that Ryse and Killzone SF were sacrificed in gameplay quality to reach the levels of graphics quality necessary to promote both consoles...They both will be forgotten in a year from now, but that's not the point of those games. They were created to show the potential of both consoles, and I think that both have been succesful. As games are not more than a 7'5 rating game, but for a launch game, both are great.

On friday i will buy my ps4 with Killzone SF and AC IV. I know that Killzone SF won't change my life precisely, but it will be enough fun and it will show me what ps4 is capable of, that's all that matters for me at launch, and it's way better than when i bought a ps3 on June 2007..., I had to wait until november to get COD 4 and Assassin's Creed.

And talking about Assassin's Creed..., nobody remembers now the reviews they got and how many people insisted the franchise should die because it was only a graphic masterpiece but a dull game??? 2 years later Ubisoft made AC 2, and it was an instant classic. I remember how I liked the game ,the first one, but felt that the game was lacking in much things in gameplay, that it was an 7-8 rating game, and that if they made a sequel it could be a 9...

There's no reason to think that Ryse and Shadow Fall can achieve the same...