By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

When I heard that comment I immediately knew someone was going to make a thread about it and completely rip it out of context and here we are.

It's not IGN saying this, it's one guy from IGN saying that this is the most impressive game he's seen from a technical standpoint. When he says that I can only shake my head, I mean that guy has played a couple levels of the game in a very controlled environment, so how exactly did he come to the conclusion that this is the most impressive game from a technical standpoint?Did he count the pixels? Did he count the effects going on? Did he count the number of NPCs and their movements? Or maybe, just maybe a Crytek developer told him what they are doing with the game from a technical standpoint and he, probably not knowing very much about the technical aspects of graphics, just went with what the developer told him, since the game is undoubtetly, and I'm not downplaying that, very pretty, and proclaimed the game the technical graphics king.

Seriously, the game looks good, very good, but saying it's technically the best looking, because that one guy said it, is ignorant, especially when every member of this forum can easily give you two technical areas where it's beaten by other next gen games, resolution and framerate.

Also I feel the game looks from what I've seen, like a poor mans GOW at best, you basically take out the riddles, the mythological creatures and the epic boss battles and instead put in human enemies and you have Ryse.