How much money Sony really lost with the PS3

[Mr Puggsly]

CGI-Quality said:

Mr Puggsly said:

CGI-Quality said:

Mr Puggsly said:

I don't know what you're babbling about.

So I'll just say again. A cheaper Xbox 360 and some nice bundle software with the entry model would have boosted sales.

MS didn't really if PS3 surpassed the 360 in overall sales so it didn't happen.

I'm sorry you mistake reality for "babbling", but it is what it is. If I'm wrong, then how do you explain the higher priced PS3 outselling its closest competition? 

Also, whether Microsoft "cared"  if the PS3 ever passed their product or not is irrelevant (though I agree that at this point, they probably don't). If it was going to happen, I firmly believe that more price cuts may have only gotten them so far. 

No, your babbling is just your opinion. The Elite 360 cost more than a PS3.  The entry model includes no HDD or games.

For the record, I'm just saying further price cuts to the 360 would have slowed the gap from closing. Why is that getting you so worked up?

Worked up? Don't see it, but you certainly seem so, given your improper (and random) use of the word "babbling".

Anyway, the 360 has been cheaper than the PS3 throughout the gen, hurting Sony most in the US (your vague example doesn't change this fact). That considered, it has been able to claw back much of the lead the 360 gained and will overtake it in total, worldwide numbers.

To me, that means that, at this juncture, the PS3 is the more desired product.

No, you were babbling.

I'm not denying that the bolded part. I'm just saying MS could have slowed the gap from closing. But you can't seem to get through your head that's all I'm saying. Further price could have done it.