happydolphin on 11 March 2013
My reasons for voting Linkz are bad. I agree that my read on him is correct, and I found his play kind of biased towards Seth, but coming to think of it it's an mediocre explanation that is acceptable when taking a step back. It's based on the premise that scum would coach their players, it doesn't mean their infallible but his opinion on Seth's play is that it is uncoached and I'm okay with that.
His suspicion of Bong is that Bong is coached. But I disagree with that. Though I disagree, I can now with a step back understand where he's coming from, at least.
Ultimately this concession is based on the idea that Linkz isn't playing perfectly, and maybe I over-estimate him.
I don't like my vote anymore...
unvote Linkz
