TruckOSaurus said:
Linkzmax said:
|
Smeags said:
Like I said, I find his views interesting. I take them and use them how I like. Sorry if you don't appreciate his artistry (Hatmoza gags here  ).
I found that this post and this post were consistent in how I was percieving things as well. That, coupled with Spurge's claim (which for now, while not concrete... is still valuable) and then your hostility towards anyone who votes against you, I figured it was a good time as any to vote for you.
|
Once again. I have no interest in your trust. I'm figuring out who's just bad and who's the scum on my lynch. You happen to be the latter.
No. My "hostility" towards those voting against me was nonexistant at the time of your vote.
Vote: Smeags
Sorry, there's no reasoning in that first post. Just a list of names. I'd be curious how you went from http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4793626 suspecting Trucks and Carl to mirroring prof, even though you don't simply do that, but it's worthless coming from you. And again the second link is from after your vote.
Oh and, Spurge's claim has no value regarding my alignment.
It's funny how much you flail when not feeling any pressure though.
|
Smeags hasn't exactly been giving me town-tells up until now apart from a big one that, in my mind, makes up for the rest of his play. He was very confident to play around with the theme very early in the game (his roleplaying posts).
To me that's something scum wouldn't do because especially in a theme as vaguely defined as this one. I've experienced it many times, when scum, there's a huge risk in playing around with the theme because you have to figure out what townies should know so one wrong assumption and you're exposed.
|
Is his willingness to play with the theme your big tell? There's no vagueness in the flavor, it's just unclear what the makeup of mafia is. Scum would already know the flavor split though, and then flavor in the OP would go a long way towards filling any gaps. Not hard at all to figure out darkness = good and go with that theme.
There was one thing that gave me caution, but Smeags handled my questions so poorly that he made up an impossible justification for his vote. That overrides anything else in my book.
