spurgeonryan said: Obviously I do not think it was baseless. I guess your sarcastic meters have been turned off. So either you guys learned how to read in China or you are deciding to just take what you want from my posts. Since he " He" (Here is a retarded symbol to boot :3) thinks what I have said is baseless then why even bother at all? If you three can muster up the stamina to read what I wrote again you willnsee that I am actually being quite rude and egging him on. Also him copying what I did last game as a lame joke is not a playstyle. So I was not contradicting myself. But you three sure have jumped to the same conclusions together! Fun! Anything else professor Wonk :) |
yes spurge what you do is very obvious. Although I don't think you ever do what you think you are doing.
If you have to come back latter to try and translate your posts, you are obviously doing it wrong.
spurge don't be radish, accept what you did and move on, denying the contradition on semantics is bad,denying it based on a lie even worse. You say linkz is scum based on stuff from previous games. "http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4660770 note you say nothing of playstlye.
conjo complaines about useing past games.http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4661136 Also nothing of playstyle.
Then you come back with this. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4661166 So if you want to say that you aren't contradicting. Then you are saying "I am useing past games, just not past games playstlye". Something that even for you makes very little sence. So it's not a failed sarcasm detector. It's a lack of doubletalk decoder.
Also what you think of as him copying you from last game he has done SEVERAL time.