NoCtiS_NoX said:
1. Yes, because I thought Stefl and Prof are scum buddies. I think Prof is rolefishing when he qouted me. "why did you vist stefl" by prof. I assumed that both of these guys are rolefishing and making a fake convo. Not only that Stefl's convo with spurge, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4441118, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4441173. I felt spurge kinda slip without realizing it. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4441200 Followed up by stefl, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4441227. Spurge is a Town-mason. There also this instance that Stefl had a convo with Rad. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4453222. This was the whole reason I think Stefl is rolefishing. but stefl flipping town makes my theory null about prof&stefl being scum buddies. Although I still feel Prof was rolefishing when he qouted me. That's why one of my earlier post on day 3. I posted that I have a mix feeling with Prof. As for 2nd sentence/question. Obviously he doesn't know who blocked him but he knows he was blocked. He was the paranoid cop afterall. 2. See no. 1. I know that risk very well so if somebody accuse me of rolefishing I am already prepared to post what I posted in no. 1 on my thoughts on stefl becasue at that time I really think he was role fishing. The thoughts running from my mind at that moment was Stefl gets away with rolefishing with spurge that flipped town mason and I think he is doing it again with that random post. 3. First off I fixed the links already so sorry for the little confusion. Just like in I said in number 1. I feel the prof was rolefishing when he qouted me. He also wants to know who is the other mason. And when Prof is posting something like this. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4469665. I really can't shake off the feeling he is rolefishing. I also don't need you or someone aside from prof explaining things on why he is doing it. You'll just comes off the person defending him and makes you look even more suspicious. 4. I already fixed it. 5. As for last sentences. I think the last sentence was a mess and I didn't explain it clearly. If you are a townie, the way you are responding to stefl IMO. You are ready to vote for him but you didn't and opted for baalz so if you are a scum or other scum voting for stefl is a waste and if the scum is still looking for a power role it's best to divert attention to the other townie. Just my 2 cents. Anyway, the purpose of it was to see how you guys will react and so far with how you respond I think I got what I want. With my experience playing with you especially in the practice round before you become very hostile towards me when I getting close in figuring you out. Every chance you get you are turning me down with attacks and making me look bad. HoS Linkz |
First, please address the bold, italicized, and underlined question.
1. This stuff about Stefl would all be relevant if you had mentioned anything day 2, or when I had originally made the point about rolefishing.
That is the only post of prof's of all the ones you claim to be rolefishing that I would agree with.(Some others are blatant nudges for claims, which as I said I didn't like, but it's different from rolefishing) However, it doesn't make sense to think that Stefl and prof are scummates in this case. They would have to KNOW you visited Stefl, which means one should have to be a Mafia Tracker, which followed you to Stefl. If you're investigative they're going to hope you don't claim damning info on Stefl instead of pushing you to reveal it. If you don't spill anything they can assume you're protective or something else, and possibly try to get you lynched. Either way they would be happy to kill you at night.
My second question was directly related to the first. How did you think scum Stefl was rolefishing with his first post, which he later clarified meant he was roleblocked?
2. See no. 1 as well. You made none of these points yesterday, when it actually mattered. It's easy to say you were thinking just about anything then, but nothing backs it up.
3. I appreciate you fixing the links. It's actually a bit bothersome that nobody else pointed out any of the errors, am I the only one that cared to read your post?
I mentioned it in no. 1, but that is rolefishing to me. Only makes sense as that with Stefl being town and prof being scum though. Mafia would know if they targeted Stefl and could try to pin it on someone else, or if they weren't the ones to target him they could try to figure out who was and net two town powers in one fell swoop. But I don't think asking the other mason to claim means much. There are pros and cons to making the information known, and I think in the end it benefits Town to know more than scum.
Now that post is a solid point for you. And it's a direct contradiction to what prof asked Stefl after Stefl claimed he was roleblocked. I don't think I was defending, just defining things, pointing out broken links, and explaining why I thought your theory was very unlikely or in other words what I think prof wasn't doing. I didn't explain what I thought prof was doing, and I'd like to hear that too. What's nagging me most with prof is he's avoiding a lot of the stuff asked of him. It's not enough to push him higher than you or FF on my scumspect list, but he's not moving down towards Wonk's level either.
4. Again, thanks for the fix. But you didn't answer my question, "In the end, Stefl's case was that he was blocked and it's a null tell as to my alignment... What defense is needed?"
5. I'd like to try to follow your logic as to how you think I'm preparing to vote for Stefl. Please give the links again and explain what I am saying in each one, in your opinion. Your new explanation still doesn't make sense to me. Why would scum try to divert their votes away from the claimed power?
In the practice round you didn't have me "figured out" as in you realized I was a SK. I was hostile towards you because as third-party my only chance of winning was to have you mislynched and then hope the right actions occur to let me survive until the end. Here, even if I were mafia and you were town, I'd have 3(or 2 accounting for radish's "confirmedness") other people I could push to be mislynched. There's no need for hostility in that case. If I'm hostile it's because I most likely need two correct lynches out of two chances. So if you're town, I don't want to read a wall of text with little to no point or an illogical point. I'm pushing you to prove to me that you're actually town or to crack as scum.
