By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NintendoFanDj said:
NightDragon83 said:
Lord Ciansworth said:
Play4Fun said:
Nintendo aren't going to launch at $400 and they sure as hell aren't launching at $450,

Why not?

For 2 reasons: (and the point you made about the other consoles' prices adjusted for inflation has no bearing on this topic, it's comparing apples to oranges).

1:  Nintendo's primary audience is the family / casual / mainstream / whatever you want to call them gaming audience, and they're not going to drop $400 on a game system just because it has a gimicky tablet controller.  They didn't jump on the 360 and PS3 bandwagons when they launched with their fancy HD graphics and Blu Ray at $399 and $499 respectively, so why on Earth would you expect them to do it for the Wii U?  And also note that the 3DS, the successor to Nintendo's biggest selling handheld of all time, struggled most of the year because of the high initial price point, which Nintendo was forced to slash by almost $100 in order to stimulate its sluggish sales, proving once again that name and branding alone won't sell consoles.

2:  On the flip side of the gaming coin, the core gamers (you know, the people that Nintendo are trying to win back this upcoming generation) aren't going to drop $400+ on the Wii U either.  Why?  They already own a console that can already do pretty much everything the Wii U can do sans the tablet controller, and they're not going to take the plunge for an unproven system that (from what we've seen so far) has only marginally better graphics, IF that, then what they already own and have been playing for the past 5-6 years.  They spent $400+ on a new console half a decade ago, and you expect one of the most notoriously fickle group of consumers in history, the hardcore gamers, to do the same next year for a system that barely outperforms the current gen console on paper, let alone in practice?  No way.

In short, next year Nintendo will be competing directly with the 360 / PS3, which will have permanent entry price points of $149 and $199 respectively by the time the Wii U launches.  There's no way Nintendo releases the Wii U at double the price of the most expensive current gen console.... they'll just end up in the exact same situation they found themselves in with the 3DS earlier this year.


About the gamers who have hd system who don't want WiiU cause they already have one. Is like saying people with Nintendo DS don't want PS Vita cause DS already has been doing Touch Screen Gaming for 7 years.

That's not even close to the same thing.  If the PS Vita had almost the exact same visual capabilities of the DS, a 7 year old system, with the same exact 3rd party multiplatform games, with the only differences being the back touchpad and bigger screen, and Sony released it at more than double what the DS was going for today, then that would be an accurate comparison.



On 2/24/13, MB1025 said:
You know I was always wondering why no one ever used the dollar sign for $ony, but then I realized they have no money so it would be pointless.