By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
leo-j said:
HappySqurriel said:
Realistically, what did you expect?

The PS3 and XBox 360 are 5/6 year old systems with performance that is surpassed by even the lowest end of modern PC components. Anyone who considers themself a PC gamer probably already has a system that is at least as powerful as the HD consoles, so developers (obviously) would treat the HD consoles like the minimum requirements.

 

 


That does look look like a 4 year old PC game with tweaked lighting on medium what's your point?

OT: “that was a bit poor choice of words, but the PC LOW & consoles obviously does not have every single quality feature PC HIGH has.” This makes sense and shouldn’t come as a surprise to many gamers. He continued to admit that “it wasn’t fully fair as the console version can’t be fully compared against the PC settings as it uses different techniques.” For example, “the shadows in the shadows in the final code are way better than PC LOW, same with animated vegetation and such.”

http://mp1st.com/2011/10/17/battlefield-3-dice-clarifies-pc-and-console-graphical-comparisons/



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!