I actually dont think the collapse is too fishy at all. The integrety of the building would be majorly comprimised with an impact of a plane flying straight into it.
Also, eyewitness reports are starting to loose validity in court. The eyewitness' memory of the events become questionable immediatly after they happen. Example: A police officer asks a witness "was the suspect black" and right away the witness will agree with it if they werent sure to begin with... the thought will be implanted just from a simple question like that. Also, if the witness goes up to someone and then they talk about the events from their point of view the witness when recalling it later will mix their point of view up with the other one all while thinking this was their point of view the entire time. A witness might not have seena detail and convince themselves they missed it because it wasnt there to begin with (as for your question the planes paintings) Source: Psych 101.
Also, why are you questioning pentagon footage? LOL... you think the governement is going to realease footage of the most secrative building in the country...
Not saying their wasnt inside involvement in the events but these two arguements are poor at best.
