| NotStan said: Asking a question in regards to whether a no lynch would be beneficial for town is now considered scummy? Whatever warrants your reason to divert attention to me I suppose. I always vote no lynch on day one, and will continue to do so in the forseeable future unless something spectacular happens. Vote No Lynch Whether you like it or not, most of the time this results in a no lynch or mislynch, in rare intances does it get the correct lynch, I could have hammered Linkz, but decided against it. |
"Heph, what are the odds of us winning if we vote for no lynch today?" Absolutely nowhere here does it speak about benefiting town. Unless you're telling me that you know Heph to be town already. Further, for Heph to give you odds he'd have to know the actual setup of the round, which is(or damn well better be) impossible regardless of his alignment.
I haven't stopped explaining myself for more than maybe two posts in a row, and I doubt that will change until this day is over. That's fine, I don't mind it one bit. I am not just going to sit back and play defense though, because there are scum to find. You just so happen to have made the post that irks me the most.
Day one almost always ends in no lynch because everyone seems to carry this fear that a mislynch here is going to cost the game. That is why I talked about cutting to the chase and just getting the day over with, because it is such a chore trying to get others to be active. If most(as in even more than a simple majority) would push for lynches, you would see people trying to steer the town as a whole towards or away from lynching certain people. That type of information is very much worth trading a possible mislynch for, and especially in powered games you can see scum trying to keep the lynch off their vital roles even if it would cost a more minor role.
