By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

After reading through most of the posts between prof, trashleg and heph, I think that the conversation does not hold enough value to judge anyone of them.

As for Heph: he tried to make a point, by claiming that prof bullies people, prof then claimed that he never bullied anyone, which is not quite true, but heph said that it is unusual for prof to bully people - I think prof is quite tame this round and isn't behaving that aggresive this game (considering he let go ABC so easy), so Heph IMO made two mistakes there:

1) It is unusual for Prof to bully people

2) Prof is more aggresiv this round then in others

As for Prof: Like stated above, he said he never bullied people, which is not true, and he is behaving not so aggresiv against ABC. I think in other rounds he would be all over him, and not let go until ABC gave up, or he turns up innocent somehow. Then again Prof is mostly right with what he thinks about trashleg. He investigated trashlegs  192-post-claim correctly and made some other valid points. Still nothing special since I don't know how trashleg plays normaly, also I feel that Prof is suspicious of trashleg just because she is too calm... while I think thats no real reason to think of someone as scum because of that. So prof is IMO wrong with the following points:

1) He never bullies people

2) People are suspicious if they keep their calm

Now to trashleg: I consider trashlegs actions not really that scummy, I think the 192-post-claim was simply a mistake, also in the discussion she did not say anything particularly suspicious, though I did not find her promised post investigating me and wonk (who is dead by now). I am not one to talk but I think she has not displayed much initiative in this game yet. Well she made only one big mistake IMO, which got her profs attention:

1) The 192-Post-Claim

There are still some posts left to read... but I want to continue now with more recent events:

I got the idea that TheProf and ABC might be on the same team this game. ABC jumped on the Wonk lynch train as soon as he smelled a possibility to avoid his lynch (granted even a townie would try avoiding his lynch, but there are better ways then jumping on someones lynchtrain), later Prof hammered Wonk pretty hasty, rescueing his scumbuddy ABC. Of course this does not mean that they are both on the same team, though I think if Prof turns out to be scum, ABC is scum. That does not mean that if prof turns out innocent ABC is innocent. Sadly if ABC turns out to be scum, I would still be in doubt of theprofs allignment. So well... I don't think I can really judge the allignment of the other one just by knowing the allignment of the other one (well, who can...)