Wonktonodi said:
Does ABC's messing up of time however make you think that he meant he wanted profs opinion like it was worded? Or do you think that he was wanting profs opinions on other players? I'm thinking he wanted to form an opinion of prof and other players who hadn't played. If you are in agreement there then I bought nothing you didn't You are right about his explanation for not mentioning trangent doesn't make sence. However another simple answer could do. Trangent hadn't posted yet and since I doubt ABC looked back to the list of players to make a list of people he went with one person he had seen post a few at the beginning but then nothing more. Now I'm not sure of the timing of me asking him these things however iirc (and please correct me if I'm wrong) it was after at least prof if not you as well were talking of ignoring ABC. Since I got enough of an explanation to satisfy me I let it go. Now with him talking in a more clear manner I do feel like going back and having him clarify things. |
1) I'm not talking about whether he wanted an opinion on prof or an opinion from prof at all. As part of his explanation for asking for prof, ABC links prof to trangent as people not posting. Then ABC explicitly states why he didn't mention trangent. As I just said in a post to prof, I do think ABC is misremembering his logic, but if you were legitimately concerned with his answer I have a very hard time believing you'd have simply accepted what he said.
@bolded I find it odd that it's been nearly 24 hours since this post and you've said quite a bit, but never directed anything at ABC.
Wonktonodi said:
2. Heph because that chance is rare. More rare than the chance that lynching a random weak player would be scum. There are always possiblities. There could be a doc or a driver or some alien tech to raise the dead. However I'll stick with what I know and not base my plans on asuming the make ups of the game. |
2) Just for the sake of completeness, IF there is a doctor and making the assumption that there are only two or three mafia(safe to say I believe) and no SK,(not a certainty) then odds are better that the doctor makes a save after a no lynch than a random lynch on a weak player. I don't think it's helpful to go through the math, but I'd be happy to after the round is over. Of course this is only true if there is a doctor, and only he(or she) and the mods know if one even exists. I haven't crunched the numbers for other protective/redirection roles(if any exist) but with pure randomness I've found they're almost always better than the doctor anyway.
Wonktonodi said:
With me more no Heph than Trashlegs. A time limit would likely mean people just voting for the person with the most votes a bit before the day ends. No timelimit give more people a chance to change their votes. Trashlegs I more see it as her wanting there to be a break for a bit and also then a less players so she can keep up better with her schedule. |
3) Is the "no" supposed to be "on?" Are the next two sentences your explanation for why you feel more uneasy about Heph than trasleg? Otherwise, why so?
4) Finally, I'd upgrade you to an HoS but Heph and trash are getting them and I only have two hands. But you said something(and I will not explain what) that had I been online at the time I'd have voted for you. Since then it doesn't seem as major as I had thought, but I'm going to be very disappointed if I was right about it.
